Back
B. R. GAVAI, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Tata Mohan Rao – Appellant
Versus
S. Venkateswarlu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of contempt case and appellant's actions. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. overview of facts leading to contempt. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. appellant's justification for actions. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's disapproval of appellant's conduct. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. modification of sentence while affirming conviction. (Para 14 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. final order regarding conviction and penalties. (Para 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
B.R. GAVAI, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The present appeals challenge the common final judgment dated 19th February 2025 passed by the learned Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (hereinafter referred to as “High Court”) in Contempt Appeal Nos. 4 and 5 of 2015 whereby the learned Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the contempt appeals, affirming the common judgment dated 27th March 2015 rendered by the learned Single Judge of the erstwhile High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh in Contempt Case No. 2233 of 2013 and Contempt Case No. 128 of 2014 convicting the appellant under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and sentencing him to undergo two months of simple imprisonment alon
Contempt of court entails serious responsibility and failure to comply with judicial orders undermines the rule of law, warranting appropriate sanctions to maintain public trust and order.
The Supreme Court clarified that demolition incurred as contempt punishment under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act is impermissible.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that willful disobedience of a court order, as defined in the Contempt of Courts Act, can lead to punishment under Section 12 of the Act.
The court clarified that appeals in contempt cases are only maintainable against orders imposing punishment, not against dismissals or exonerations.
Summoning person without there being any crime registered against him and detaining him would itself be violative of basic principles.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
