SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 890

ABHAY S. OKA, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Gyan Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Petitioner-in-person
For the Respondent(s): Mr. K.M.Nataraj,ASG Mr. Sharath N.Nambiar,Adv. Mr. Indira Bhakar,Adv. Mr. Vinayak Sharma,Adv. Mr. Vatsal Joshi,Adv. Mr. Anuj Udupa,Adv. Mr. Chitransh Sharma,Adv. Ms. Satvika Thakur,Adv. Mr. Yogya Rajpurohit,Adv. Mr. Aayush Saklani,Adv. Ms. Nitkita Capoor,Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. K.M.Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Sourav Roy, AOR Mr. Pranav Bafna, Adv. Mr. Anshu Deshoande, Adv. Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Adv. Intervenor-in-person

Judgement Key Points

What is the obligation of the Central Government to maintain National Highways, including removal of encroachments and safety measures? What is the procedure and mechanism for removal of unauthorised occupation of highway lands under the 2002 Act (Sections 24, 26) and related rules? What steps and reforms did the Supreme Court direct to improve survey, inspection, grievance redressal, and public reporting for encroachments on National Highways?

Key Points: - (!) The petition concerns safety of National Highways and enforcement of the 2002 Act and 2004 Rules. - (!) There is a need for regular survey of highways to detect unauthorized structures or occupation. - (!) Court directed highways authorities to devise a scheme for regular inspections, grievance redressal, and prompt action on encroachments. - (!) The Court requires action under Section 26 to remove encroachments and Section 24 for prevention. - (!) The Highway Administration’s composition and responsibilities under the 2002 Act and 2019 amendment are outlined. - (!) Lack of effective action in compliance affidavits; directives to file state-wise compliance data by dates. - (!) Directions to establish a portal/ toll-free mechanism and publicity for reporting encroachments and complaints. - (!) Time-bound implementation deadlines (e.g., by 30 Sept 2024; subsequent hearings). - (!) Provisions establishing Highway Administrations and their powers. - (!) Rule 3 of the 2004 Rules (post-2019 amendment) outlines duties including SOPs and policy implementation. - (!) - (!) Specific mandatories from the continuing directions on publicizing Rajmargyatra, complaint categories, and inspection teams, with timelines. - (!) List for reporting compliance on 15th September 2025.

What is the obligation of the Central Government to maintain National Highways, including removal of encroachments and safety measures?

What is the procedure and mechanism for removal of unauthorised occupation of highway lands under the 2002 Act (Sections 24, 26) and related rules?

What steps and reforms did the Supreme Court direct to improve survey, inspection, grievance redressal, and public reporting for encroachments on National Highways?


ORDER :

ABHAY S. OKA, J.

1. A very important issue has been raised in this petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. In short, the issue is about the safety of our National Highways. It is pointed out in this petition, based on the report titled “Road Accidents in India – 2017”, that 53,181 persons were killed during the year 2017 on highways in India. Attention of the Court was invited to the Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 (for short, ‘the 2002 Act’) and the Highway Administration Rules, 2004 (for short, ‘the 2004 Rules’). The prayers made are very wide. Although there may be some limitations on the writ Court in granting some of the prayers, nevertheless, the issues raised are very important in the context of highway safety.

2. We have heard the petitioner appearing in person, Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, the learned counsel appointed as amicus curiae, Shri K M Nataraj, the learned Additional Solicitor General and Shri Rajiv Pratap Rudy, an intervenor, appearing in person, who is a Member of Parliament. Paragraph Nos. 1 to 7 of the order dated 20th February 2024, passed by this Court read thus:

    “1. Heard the petitioner appearing in person and th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top