B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR
A. N. Santhanam – Appellant
Versus
K. Elangovan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The respondent in this appeal filed complaint against the appellant herein for the offence punishable under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram dismissed the complaint after recording the statement of the complainant and as well as five witnesses.
2. Being aggrieved by the dismissal of the complaint, the respondent herein had filed Criminal Revision Case No. 1045 of 2003 in the High Court of Madras. The High Court, upon appreciation of material available on record, found that the complaint filed by the respondent and the statements of the witnesses clearly make out a case against the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 3(1)(x) of the said Act and accordingly, allowed the revision duly setting aside the order passed by the Magistrate dismissing the complaint.
3. Be it noted, the Criminal Revision Case filed by the respondent was heard and disposed of without any notice whatsoever to the appellant.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant raised a short question that the High Court committed an error in disposing of the Criminal Revision without any notice to the
Raghu Raj Singh Rousha versus Shivam Sundaram Promoters Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. 2009 (2) SCC 363
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.