SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(SC) 1221

L. NAGESWARA RAO, SANJIV KHANNA, B. R. GAVAI
Siddaraju – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Malini Poduval, AOR Ms. Babita Sant, Adv. Mrs. Madhvi Divan, Ld. ASG Mr. Rajan Kr. Chourasia, Adv. Ms. Vaishali Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sanjai Kumar Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Prashant Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kuriakose Varghese, Adv. Mr. V. Shyamohan, Adv. Mr. Surya Prakash, Adv. Mr. Sudeep Aravind Panicker, Adv. Ms. Sohini Chowdhury, Adv. M/S. Kmnp Law Aor, AOR Ms. Jayna Kothari, Sr.Adv. Ms. Rukhsana Choudhury, AOR Mr. Abhinav Ramkrishna, AOR
For the Respondents: Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Md.Apzal Ansari, Adv. Mrinal Gopal Elker, AOR Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR Mr. G. Prakash, AOR Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Adv. Ms. Beena Prakash, adv. Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, AOR Mr. Vardhman Kaushik , AOR Mr. R.C. Mishra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ilin Saraswat, Adv. Mr. Ananya Mishra, Adv. Mr. Mahendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajnish Kumar Jha, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta, AOR Mr. Shashank Singh, AOR Mr. Rajan Mani, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR Ms. Ritu Kumar, Adv. Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv.

Table of Content
1. clarification on previous judgment regarding reservations. (Para 1)
2. details on issues for clarification requested. (Para 2)
3. need for clarification on implementation instructions. (Para 3)
4. opposition to the necessity for clarifications. (Para 4)
5. court's opinion on clarity and direction to issue instructions. (Para 5)
6. disposition of the miscellaneous application. (Para 6)

ORDER :

1. The correctness of the judgment of this Court in Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. , (2016) 13 SCC 153 was raised by Union of India before a Division Bench of this Court. In Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (supra), this Court held that persons with disabilities are entitled for reservation in promotions. The matter was referred to a larger Bench for considering the issues raised by the Union of India. After a detailed consideration of the judgments of this Court in Union of India & Anr. v. National Federation of the Blind & Ors. , (2013) 10 SCC 772 , National Federation of the Blind v. Sanjay Kothari, Secretary Department of Personnel and Training , (2015) 9 SCALE 611 and Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (supra), this Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top