SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1981

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Commissioner of Customs – Appellant
Versus
N. C. John And Sons Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. N. Venkatraman, Ld. ASG Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Praneet Pranav, Adv. Mr. Raghvendra P. Shankar, Adv. Ms. Rukhmini Bobde, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Das, Adv.

Table of Content
1. intent to claim rewards must be clear. (Para 1)
2. agreement with high court's view. (Para 2 , 3)
3. special leave petition dismissed. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER :

1. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, more particularly, when right from the very beginning the respondent had declared the intention to claim the rewards under the MEIS (Merchandise Export from India Scheme) and it was found that there was an inadvertent mistake in checking the column 'N' instead of 'Y', we see no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court.

2. As such, we are in complete agreement with the view taken by the High Court.

3. No interference of this Court is called for.

4. The special leave petition stands dismissed.

5. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top