SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1972

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology & Natural History, Coimbatore – Appellant
Versus
Mathew K. Sebastian – Respondent


Table of Content
1. dismissal and subsequent reinstatement results in entitlement to back wages. (Para 1 , 2)
2. management argues against back wages due to lack of proof of unemployment. (Para 3)
3. court upholds the entitlement for back wages based on circumstances of employment. (Para 4)
4. employee's burden of proof shifts to the employer on asserting unemployment. (Para 5 , 6)
5. principle of 'no work no pay' does not apply when unemployment is due to management's actions. (Para 7)
6. judgment confirmed; management required to pay back wages with interest. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT :

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 27.07.2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Appeal No. 35/2021, by which the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the said appeal and has confirmed the judgment and order dated 25.02.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court allowing writ petition No. 29201 of 2020 preferred by the respondent herein and has directed the petitioners – management to pay back wages along with interest @ 9% per annum to the respondent herein – original writ petitioner for the period from 23.08.2002 to 30.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top