SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2759

PIYUSH AGRAWAL
Vidya Rawat – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Y.K. Sinha and Akshat Sinha, Advocates.
For the Respondent:C.S.C.,Vivek Ratan Agrawal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Piyush Agrawal, J.

List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the respondent no. 3.

2. Heard Shri Akshat Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.

3. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the award dated 25.06.2006 passed by the Labour Court, 1st, Ghaziabad in Adjudication Case No. 240 of 1994 so far as it has not awarded back wages to the petitioner and grant full back wages from the date of termination till the actual reinstatement.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Assembly Girl by the respondent no. 3 on 19.11.1985. On 14.08.1993, she was terminated from service without any opportunity of hearing or paying retrenchment compensation to her. Thereafter, a reference was made. After exchange of pleadings and evidence, the Labour Court, vide impugned award dated 25.06.2006, has held that the order terminating the services of the petitioner is illegal and directed for reinstatement of the petitioner in service, but did not award any back wages to the petitioner without assigning any reason. He further submits that the said award has not been challenged by the respondent no. 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top