SANJAY KAROL, JOYMALYA BAGCHI
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KAROL, J.
Leave Granted.
2. The present appeal arises from the final judgment and order dated 12th December 2022, passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Misc. Appeal No. 554 of 2017, which, in turn, was preferred against the award dated 19th December 2016 passed in Case Claim No.22 of 2015 by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, District: Seedhi (M.P).
3. The facts giving rise to the present appeal, in a nutshell are that on 27th November 2013, at about 8:15 p.m., the deceased, namely, Gokul Prasad, aged 32 years, was returning home from a weekly market, travelling in a vehicle i.e., TATA 407 Truck bearing registration No. M.P. 53G/03861[Hereinafter referred to as “Offending Vehicle”.], being driven by Respondent No. 3 herein. Upon reaching near Kurwaiha Ghati Road, the said vehicle driven, in a rash and negligent manner, met with an accident. As a result, the deceased sustained severe injuries and died on the spot.
4. A claim petition was filed on behalf of the Appellants (the legal representatives of the deceased) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Tribunal seeking compensation to the tune of Rs. 49,26,000/- claiming the
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi
Mukund Dewangan v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Limited & Others
New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Vedwati & Ors.
New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Asharani & Ors.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Paravathneni & Anr.
Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rambha Devi
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Baljit Kaur
Anu Bhanvara v. IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Amrit Lal Sood v. Kaushalya Devi Thapar
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. C.M. Jaya
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Challa Upendra Rao
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Vimal Devi
(1) Driving Licence – No endorsement is required to drive a commercial vehicle of type in question, by Driver who possesses a license to drive a Light Motor Vehicle (LMV).(2) Motor Insurance – Princi....
Liability of insurers for gratuitous passengers in goods vehicles established through the 'pay and recover' principle.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the insurance company is not liable to pay compensation for unauthorized passengers in goods vehicles, based on the interpretation of relevant....
Point of Law : Tribunals in interpreting the policy conditions would apply "the rule of main purpose" and the concept of "fundamental breach" to allow defences available to the insured under section ....
The court reinforced the 'Pay and Recover' principle, mandating insurers to pay compensation to claimants for gratuitous passenger injuries, even if policy conditions were breached.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the insurance company is not statutorily required to cover the liability for an unauthorised passenger in a goods vehicle, based on the interp....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.