SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1116

SANJAY KUMAR, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Prakash Chimanlal Sheth – Appellant
Versus
Jagruti Keyur Rajpopat – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anantha Narayana M.G., AOR Mr. Shakeer Abbas, Adv. Mr. M.L. Gopalakrishna, Adv. Mr. V.C. Shukla, Adv. Ms. Divija Mahajan, Adv. Mrs. Rakhi Madiyal, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Pulkit Prakash, AOR Mr. Mudit Makhijani, Adv. Mr. Eeshan Pandey, Adv. Mr. Arjun Mohan, Adv. Ms. Arushi Sharma, Adv. Ms. Ankita Sinha, Adv.

Judgement Key Points

Based on the provided legal document, the key points are as follows:

  1. The primary issue in the case concerns the territorial jurisdiction for filing complaints related to offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (N.I. Act) (!) .

  2. The appellant maintained his bank account with the Kotak Mahindra Bank at its Bendurwell, Mangalore Branch, and the cheques issued by the respondent were deposited at the Mumbai Branch of the same bank for credit to his account (!) .

  3. The appellant had previously maintained his account at the Mumbai Branch but transferred it to the Mangalore Branch before the filing of the complaint (!) .

  4. According to Section 142(2)(a) of the N.I. Act, the jurisdiction for offences under Section 138 is vested in the court where the cheque is delivered for collection, i.e., the branch of the bank where the payee maintains the account (!) .

  5. The Court held that since the appellant’s account was with the Mangalore Branch at the time of presentation of the cheques, he was justified in filing the complaint there. The earlier assumption that his account was with the Mumbai Branch was incorrect (!) (!) .

  6. The orders of the lower courts, which had held that the complaint should be filed at the Mumbai Branch, were found to be erroneous and contrary to the provisions of Section 142(2)(a) (!) .

  7. The appeals were allowed, and the case was remanded for the competent court at Mangalore to entertain and adjudicate the complaint cases in accordance with law (!) .

  8. All pending applications were to be closed, and the previous orders confirming the jurisdiction of the Mumbai court were set aside (!) .

These points summarize the court’s reasoning and final decision regarding the correct territorial jurisdiction for filing complaints under Section 138 of the N.I. Act based on the location of the bank account maintained by the appellant.


JUDGMENT

SANJAY KUMAR, J

1. Leave granted.

2. The short issue in these appeals is as to where the appellant was required to file his complaints in relation to offences punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for brevity, ‘N.I. Act’).

3. The appellant’s case was that Keyur Lalitbhai Rajpopat borrowed a sum of Rs. 38,50,000/- from him and the respondent herein, viz., Jagruti Keyur Rajpopat, being the wife of Keyur Lalitbhai Rajpopat, stood as a guarantor for the repayment of the loan. It appears that she also availed financial assistance from the appellant and four cheques came to be issued by her during September, 2023, in discharge of her husband’s liability and her own liability. These cheques were deposited by the appellant at Kotak Mahindra Bank, Opera House Branch, Mumbai. However, they were dishonored due to insufficiency of funds, as was intimated to the appellant on 15.09.2023. Thereupon, he filed four complaint cases in C.C. Nos. 1258, 1259, 1260 and 1261 of 2023 under Section 200 Cr.P.C. read with Section 138 of the N.I. Act before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Fifth Court, Mangalore. However, by order dated 12.12.2023, the learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top