V. D. Raveesha vs State Of Karnataka

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(SC) 1376

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
V. D. Raveesha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anil C Nishani, Adv. Mr. Keshav Murthy, Adv. Mr. Jayram, Adv. Mr. Vishwesh R Murnal, Adv. M/S. Krishna & Nishani Law Chambers, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Raghavendra M. Kulkarni, Adv.

Table of Content
1. overview of criminal case background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. defense argues convictions were erroneous. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court analysis of evidence and arguments. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. court's analysis and reasoning regarding the evidence and the decision on criminal intent. (Para 19)
5. differentiating breach of trust from cheating. (Para 20 , 21)
6. final ruling and sentence adjustment. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)

JUDGMENT :

The present petition impugns the Final Judgment and Order dated 11.10.2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Impugned Order’) passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as the ‘High Court’) in Criminal Revision Petition No.653/2020, whereby the High Court confirmed the Judgment and Order dated 25.08.2020 passed in Criminal Appeal No.29/2018 by the learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tumakuru (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Appellate Court’) which had affirmed the conviction recorded and sentence awarded to the petitioner, by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tumakuru (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Trial Court’) vide Judgment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document