Back
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Ebtesham Khatoon – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. admission regulations and notifications for neet (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. eligibility of students without neet examination (Para 4) |
| 3. impact of withholding results and degrees (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. disposition of special leave petitions (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER :
1. The petitioners are students of under-graduate AYUSH courses. Admittedly, they obtained admission to said courses without having appeared for the NEET UG-2019 examination. The petitioners contended that they did not have notice of the fact that for seeking admission to the said courses, they were required to appear for the NEET UG-2019 examination.
2. Their admissions was questioned and the petitioners filed Writ Petitions before the High Court where the learned Single Judge allowed admission of non-NEET students in AYUSH courses on the ground that there has not been proper publication of the applicability of NEET UG-2019 for admission to such AYUSH courses.
3. The Union of India challenged the said order before the Division Bench of the High Court. The Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta vide common impugned order set aside the orders passed by the Single Judge allowing admission of non-NEET students. The Div
Admission eligibility and documentation requirements for AYUSH courses based on NEET-UG Exam 2019 and relevant regulations.
The necessity of NEET UG-2019 qualification for admission to BUMS/BAMS/BHMS Courses for the academic session 2019-20 as per the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 and the Regulations of 2018.
Point of Law; Prescribing a minimum percentile for admission to the Under Graduate Courses for the year 2019-2020 was vehemently defended by the Central Council and the Union of India by submitting t....
Discretion under regulations for educational admissions must be exercised considering only pertinent factors, and the Union's refusal to further lower NEET percentile requirements was lawful given th....
The discretion vested by Regulation 2(d) is applicable in a situation where there are insufficient candidates in the respective categories who have scored the minimum marks in the NEET. Interference ....
Merely because interim orders have been passed which were adinterim exparte orders without the benefit of the arguments of the other side on the basis of the replies filed and the pleadings, such int....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
