SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1326

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Asiatic Oxygen And Acetylene Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Kedarnath Yadav – Respondent


Table of Content
1. jurisdiction and procedural background of the case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. findings regarding the retrenchment and reinstatement. (Para 3 , 4 , 8 , 10)
3. details of retrenchment and its legality. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. conclusions on reinstatement and settlement. (Para 11 , 12 , 17 , 19)
5. arguments from both parties regarding financial conditions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. conclusive orders passed regarding payments and settlements. (Para 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. These appeals arise from the Judgment and order passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, dated 8-1-2019 in Writ Appeal Nos.460/2018 and 492/2018, by which a Division Bench of the High Court allowed the appeals preferred by the respondents -herein (workmen) and thereby set aside the judgment passed by the Single Judge to a certain extent.

3. The issue involved in the present litigation is quite limited.

4. On 8-11-2004, the Industrial Court, Raipur, Chhattisgarh passed an order dated 8-11-2004 setting aside the Award passed by the Labour Court dated 4-12-2003 and directing reinstatement of the workmen with back wage and consequential benefits.

5. It appears from the materi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top