SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1327

SANDEEP MEHTA, VIKRAM NATH
Alok Kumar Jha – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background facts of the case. (Para 3 , 4)
2. court's observations regarding eligibility and fairness. (Para 5)
3. modification of previous judgments and directions issued. (Para 6)
4. final decision and conclusion of the appeal. (Para 8 , 9)

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 17.01.2022 passed by Patna High Court in Civil Writ Jurisdiction No. 13602 of 2015 by which the writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed and the order dated 07.08.2015 of the Central Administrative Tribunal [CAT], Patna was upheld. The Tribunal had allowed the Original Application filed by Respondent No. 7 Gangesh Kumar Chaudhary and had set aside the appointment of Appellant on the post of Gram Dak Sevak with a direction to authorities to consider Respondent No. 7 for appointment on the post of Gramin Dak Sevak Branch Post Office [GDSBPO].

4. The facts leading to present appeal are summarized as follows:

4.1. In 1991, Respondent No. 7 Gangesh Kumar Choudhary passed the Bihar School Examination with 42% receiving 376 marks out of 900. The certificate issued by Bihar School Education Board recorded hi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top