SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1375

SANJAY KAROL, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Sadhana Tomar – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kushwaha – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts surrounding the accident and compensation claim. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. assessment of income and multiplier controversy. (Para 8 , 10 , 12)
3. court's observations on dependency and compensation rationale. (Para 9 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. final decision on compensation calculations. (Para 17 , 18)

ORDER :

1 year 10 months 3 years 10 months 1 year 10 months

1. Leave Granted

3. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that : on 25th September 2016, the deceased, namely Dheeraj Singh Tomar, aged 24 years, was travelling in an Auto bearing registration No. MP 30-R-0582 (hereinafter referred to as the "offending vehicle") along with other passengers. The driver of the offending vehicle was driving rashly and negligently, overturned the offending vehicle at Gohad Chauraha Road near Gautum Nagar, Bajrang Washing Centre at Gwalior, due to which the deceased died on the spot and the other passengers suffered injuries.

5. The Tribunal by its Order dated 9th October 2018, observed that Respondent No.1 and 2 are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation as the driver, at the time of accident, was driving the vehicle without a valid and effective driving l

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top