SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1396

SANDEEP MEHTA, VIKRAM NATH
P. V. Krishnabhat – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellants involved in dowry and cruelty allegations. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. appellants argue allegations are vague and unsubstantiated. (Para 6 , 10 , 11)
3. court finds lack of specificity in allegations. (Para 7 , 8 , 13 , 14)
4. previous court findings deemed relevant in criminal proceedings. (Para 15 , 16)
5. criminal proceedings quashed due to lack of evidence. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)

ORDER :

2. The appellants in the appeal arising from SLP(Crl) No. 1754 of 2024 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant, and the appellant in the appeal arising from SLP(Crl) No. 2966 of 2024 is the husband of the complainant.

4. Upon the complaint dated 10.02.2019, made by the complainant, FIR in Crime No. 82/2019 was registered against the appellants for the offences under sections 498A, 504, 506 IPC ; sections 3 and 4 of DP Act, and 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(1)(w) of the SC/ST Act. Chargesheet was filed against all the three appellants and subsequently, the Trial Court vide order dated 20.09.2019 took cognizance in the case and issued process against the appellants.

6. Appellants approached the High Court through Criminal Petition No. 1910/2020 seeking setting aside of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top