SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1401

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA AND R. MAHADEVAN, JJ.
The State Of Uttar Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Survendra Kumar @ Sunil Kumar And Another – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 386 of 2017
Decided on : 16-01-2025

Reliability of evidence and witness credibility are crucial for criminal conviction; discrepancies in testimony and FIR registration can lead to acquittal.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 302 and Arms Act - Appeal by the State against acquittal of accused in double murder case - High Court overturned trial court's conviction citing lack of reliable eyewitness testimony and failure to prove firearm recovery - Prosecution's case dependent on discredited eye-witnesses and inappropriate FIR procedures leading to doubts about witness credibility and evidence reliability - Examined evidentiary standards for convictions - Appeals dismissed. (Paras 1, 34, 42, 54)

Facts of the case:
The deceased, an agricultural couple, were shot by the respondents during a property dispute. Eye-witnesses, including the deceased's sons, later claimed to observe the incident, but their credibility was challenged. The FIR's authenticity was questioned. (Paras 2, 4, 6, 38)

Findings of Court:
The High Court correctly assessed evidence and determined reasonable doubt regarding the reliability of witnesses. The FIR's inconsistencies and lack of corroborative evidence undermined the prosecution’s case. (Paras 36, 54)

Issues: Whether the High Court erred in acquitting the respondents based on insufficient evidence and questioning the authenticity of the eyewitness accounts and the FIR. (Paras 33, 38)

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that reliable evidence is essential for a conviction, and uncertainties around the witness testimonies and FIR registration process justified the High Court's decision to acquit. (Paras 39-54)

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and incidents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. fir document and issues with registration. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. state's arguments against the high court judgment. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
4. defense counsels' arguments and witness credibility. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. court's analysis of evidence reliability. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
6. final conclusions and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 51 , 52 , 53)

ORDER

1. This appeal is at the instance of the State of Uttar Pradesh and is directed against the Judgment and Order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 17-9-2015 in Criminal Appeal No.2376/2011, by which the High Court allowed the appeal filed by the respondents - herein - original accused and thereby set aside the Judgment and Order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.4, Fatehpur in Sessions Trial No.620/2005, 621/2005 and 622/2005 respectively, arising from the First Information Report bearing Crime No.30/2005, Crime No.31/2005 and Crime No.32/2005 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short the 'IPC') and Section 25 of the ARMS ACT .

2. The case of the prosecution may be summarized as under:-

3. The deceased were husband and wife. They were agriculturists. They earned their livelihood from agricultural operations. The respondents - herein (original accused persons) are brothers. They are also agriculturists and they also earn their livelihood from agricultural operations. It appears from the materials on record that there was a long standing dispute between the deceased persons and the accused persons relating to a property.

4. It is the case of the prosecution that on the date of incident, i.e., 27-3-2005 at about 11.30 a.m., the accused persons picked up an altercation with the deceased and at the end of it the two accused fired from their respective fire arms resulting in serious injuries to the husband and wife who later succumbed.

5. According to the prosecution, at the time of the incident the two sons of the deceased persons were present. 'PW 1' - Subhash Kumar, and the 'PW 2' - Suddu claim to be the eye-witnesses to the incident.

6. The First Information Report came to be resisted at around 1.50 p.m. in Thariyav Police Station, District Fatehpur, U.P. by 'PW 1. The First Information Report reads thus:-

    "PS: Thariav (Paper Torn) Chandrabhan Prasad Tiwari, R/o Village: Aurayi, District: (Paper Torn) resident. Today on 27.03.2005 at about (Paper Torn) in the day time, when my mother by name: Kunti Devi aged about 50 years and my father: Chandrabhan (Paper Torn) Tiwari, aged about 55 years were present in our Lentil Fields to cut the harvest, at that itself, our villagers Sukhendra Kumar and Chulli Tiwari - both sons of Krishna Gopal Tiwari with whom we have previous land dispute already armed with illegal fire arms came to the field at about 11.30 AM to my parents and objected them from cutting the standing crop to which we told them -"This field belong to us and this crop too belongs to us." This enraged them as a result of which they fired with their aforesaid firearms in a random manner resulting in the wounds upon my parents who died instantaneously at the spot itself. On witnessing this ghastly incident the agricultural workers working in the field got scared ran away from there and even passers too abandoned their normal road route and fled away from the spot towards the village by walk ways path due to the scare and commotion and terror created by these assailants resulting in chaos and atmosphere of terror in the whole area meanwhile this incident has been witnessed by the neighbourhood workers present nearby at that moment. The dead bodies of my deceased parents are still lying on the spot. Applicant: Subhash Kumar, S/o: Chandrabhan Prasad Tiwari, Village: Aurayi, PS: Thariyav, Fatehpur, Date 27.03.2005. Written by: Md. Waheed, S/o: Bhullu, R/o: Bahrampur, PS: Thariyav, Fat

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top