SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA AND R. MAHADEVAN, JJ.
The State Of Uttar Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Survendra Kumar @ Sunil Kumar And Another – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 386 of 2017
Decided on : 16-01-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and incidents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. fir document and issues with registration. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. state's arguments against the high court judgment. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. defense counsels' arguments and witness credibility. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. court's analysis of evidence reliability. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. final conclusions and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 51 , 52 , 53) |
ORDER
1. This appeal is at the instance of the State of Uttar Pradesh and is directed against the Judgment and Order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 17-9-2015 in Criminal Appeal No.2376/2011, by which the High Court allowed the appeal filed by the respondents - herein - original accused and thereby set aside the Judgment and Order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.4, Fatehpur in Sessions Trial No.620/2005, 621/2005 and 622/2005 respectively, arising from the First Information Report bearing Crime No.30/2005, Crime No.31/2005 and Crime No.32/2005 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (for short the 'IPC') and Section 25 of the ARMS ACT .
2. The case of the prosecution may be summarized as under:-
3. The deceased were husband and wife. They were agriculturists. They earned their livelihood from agricultural operations. The respondents - herein (original accused persons) are brothers. They are also agriculturists and they also earn their livelihood from agricultural operations. It appears from the materials on record that there was a long standing dispute between the deceased persons and the accused persons relating to a property.
4. It is the case of the prosecution that on the date of incident, i.e., 27-3-2005 at about 11.30 a.m., the accused persons picked up an altercation with the deceased and at the end of it the two accused fired from their respective fire arms resulting in serious injuries to the husband and wife who later succumbed.
5. According to the prosecution, at the time of the incident the two sons of the deceased persons were present. 'PW 1' - Subhash Kumar, and the 'PW 2' - Suddu claim to be the eye-witnesses to the incident.
6. The First Information Report came to be resisted at around 1.50 p.m. in Thariyav Police Station, District Fatehpur, U.P. by 'PW 1. The First Information Report reads thus:-
"PS: Thariav (Paper Torn) Chandrabhan Prasad Tiwari, R/o Village: Aurayi, District: (Paper Torn) resident. Today on 27.03.2005 at about (Paper Torn) in the day time, when my mother by name: Kunti Devi aged about 50 years and my father: Chandrabhan (Paper Torn) Tiwari, aged about 55 years were present in our Lentil Fields to cut the harvest, at that itself, our villagers Sukhendra Kumar and Chulli Tiwari - both sons of Krishna Gopal Tiwari with whom we have previous land dispute already armed with illegal fire arms came to the field at about 11.30 AM to my parents and objected them from cutting the standing crop to which we told them -"This field belong to us and this crop too belongs to us." This enraged them as a result of which they fired with their aforesaid firearms in a random manner resulting in the wounds upon my parents who died instantaneously at the spot itself. On witnessing this ghastly incident the agricultural workers working in the field got scared ran away from there and even passers too abandoned their normal road route and fled away from the spot towards the village by walk ways path due to the scare and commotion and terror created by these assailants resulting in chaos and atmosphere of terror in the whole area meanwhile this incident has been witnessed by the neighbourhood workers present nearby at that moment. The dead bodies of my deceased parents are still lying on the spot. Applicant: Subhash Kumar, S/o: Chandrabhan Prasad Tiwari, Village: Aurayi, PS: Thariyav, Fatehpur, Date 27.03.2005. Written by: Md. Waheed, S/o: Bhullu, R/o: Bahrampur, PS: Thariyav, Fat
AI
Reliability of evidence and witness credibility are crucial for criminal conviction; discrepancies in testimony and FIR registration can lead to acquittal.
Mere failure of the prosecution in producing reports from the Forensic Science Laboratory relating to the weapon of offence and the blood-stained earth and clothes would not derogate from the veracit....
The prosecution failed to prove the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to contradictions in witness testimonies and lack of corroborative evidence.
The acquittal of the accused was upheld due to significant doubts regarding eyewitness credibility and procedural inconsistencies in the prosecution's case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, and the importance of credible and consistent witness testimonies.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.