SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1452

B. V. NAGARATHNA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Action Committee Unaided – Respondent


Table of Content
1. conclusion on miscellaneous application (Para 1 , 9 , 10)
2. duty of parties to appear in proceedings (Para 2 , 4 , 5)
3. disposal of slp with liberty to file lpa (Para 3 , 6)
4. open contentions for future hearings (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER :

1. Delay condoned.

2. This miscellaneous application has been filed by the respondent(s) in C.A. No.4545/2024 (@ SLP (C) No.17978/2014) by contending that they did not appear before this Court in the said matter which was disposed of by this Court on 21.03.2024.

3. Further, the appellant/Municipal Corporation Of Delhi (MCD) also did not bring to the notice of this Court that the respondent(s) in the said special leave petition had not appeared in the matter and further the said special leave petition was filed as against the order of learned Single Judge dated 29.11.2012 directly before this Court.

4. Learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant submitted that there was a fault on the part of the respondent(s) in not responding to the notice(s) issued by this Court and not participating in the said proceeding. However, there was a duty cast on the appellant(s) to have brought to the notice of this Court that the batch of cases compr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top