IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tushar Rao Gedela, J.
M/s Anand Granite Exports Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Sharma – Respondent
CM(M) 517 of 2023 & CM APPL. 15394 of 2023
Decided On : 28-03-2023
Order XXXVII Rule 3 (5) CPC - Delay in adjudicating application - Direction to Trial Court for expeditious disposal
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner is aggrieved by the delay in the Trial Court's decision on the application under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (5) of the Code of Civil Procedure, despite numerous hearings.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the delay in adjudicating the application was prejudicial to the petitioner and directed the Trial Court to dispose of the application expeditiously.
Issues: Delay in Trial Court's decision on the application under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (5) CPC
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the number of hearings should have resulted in a timely decision and directed the Trial Court to dispose of the application within the next 15 days.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with a direction to the Trial Court to dispose of the application under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (5) CPC within the next 15 days.
JUDGMENT
Tushar Rao Gedela, J. (Oral)
[The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode]
1. Petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that despite a number of hearings, the learned Trial Court has not passed the orders on the application under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (5) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter as "CPC").
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/plaintiff submits that hearings on 22 separate dates have taken place before the learned Trial Court on the application seeking leave to defend filed by the respondent. However, no orders till date have been passed in the said application.
3. Learned counsel submits that the delay in adjudicating the said application is prejudicially affecting the petitioner/plaintiff and prays for a direction that the learned Trial Court dispose of the said application expeditiously.
4. It is also submitted that the learned Trial Court has posted the matter on 25.04.2023 for hearing arguments on the said application.
5. The advance notice of the present petition has already been made in terms of the notification No. 69/Rules/DHC dated 05.12.2019 of this Court, in terms whereof:
"5. Appearance on the first date of listing:
(a) Where a Civil Miscellaneous (Main) Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India or Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is filed, any opposite party desiring to oppose any of the prayers made in such petition or in any interim application accompanying such petition shall appear personally or through counsel to make submissions as he / she may desire before the Court.
(b) In case any opposite party does not appear before the Court upon advance service of the petition, the Court may not issue any further notice to such opposite party and may pass any order(s) as it may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
6. Since the only prayer made by the petitioner in the present petition is only to direct the Trial Court to take up and dispose of the application expeditiously, no purpose would be served to seek response from the respondent/defendant in the present petition.
7. In view of the above and after perusing the order sheets of the learned Trial Court, this Court is of the considered opinion that it would be in the interests of justice that the learned Trial Court takes up the matter and disposes of the same expeditiously.
8. The number of hearings that have taken place, ordinarily would have culminated in an appropriate order being passed.
9. In view of aforesaid, this Court directs the learned Trial Court to take up the application under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (5) CPC, 1908 on 25.04.2023 and dispose of the same on 25.04.2023, or soon thereafter, but within next 15 days.
10. In view of above, the petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
11. Pending application also stands disposed of.
The Court emphasized the need for expeditious disposal of applications under Order XXXVII Rule 3 (5) CPC to prevent prejudicial effects on the petitioner.
The court has the authority to direct the learned Trial Court to expedite the proceedings and dispose of pending applications within specified timelines.
Court emphasized liberal construction of applications under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC to favor merits over procedural technicalities, ensuring parties can contest their cases substantively.
The need for the Trial Court to decide the application of the Petitioner on its own merits and the imposition of legal costs as a condition for the liberty granted.
Timely resolution of procedural matters is essential for the expeditious conduct of trials.
Courts may direct the expeditious disposal of suits that have been pending for a long time, especially when one party is engaging in delaying tactics.
Mandatory compliance with court directions
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.