Anju Dagar vs Vikas Chaudhary - 2025 Supreme(SC) 1502

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(SC) 1502

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, BELA M. TRIVEDI
Anju Dagar – Appellant
Versus
Vikas Chaudhary – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Advcate, Mr. Ishan Roy Chowdhury, Advocate and Ms. Surbhi Mehta, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate

Table of Content
1. transfer petition by husband dismissed based on prior decision (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's considerations for transfer based on convenience (Para 4)
3. order for case record transfer and virtual participation permission (Para 5 , 6 , 8)

ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. Having regard to the distance between the two Courts, i.e., Court at Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh and Court at Panchkula, Haryana, as also to the fact that the petitioner is working as a teacher in a school, where the children of the petitioner are studying, and also the fact that the maintenance petition filed by the petitioner - wife is already pending at Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh, we are inclined to accept the present petition.

5. The records of the case be transferred forthwith to the transferee Court.

7. The Transfer Petition is allowed.

T.P.(CRL.) NO. 627 of 2024

2. Since, we have allowed the transfer petition being T.P. (C) No. 1445 OF 2024 filed by the petitioner - wife seeking transfer of application filed by the petitioner - husband being Matrimonial Petition No. 172/2024 titled as " Vikas Chaudhary Vs. Anju Dagar " from the Court of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bijnor, Uttar Prades

Click Here to Read the rest of this document