SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1535

J. K. MAHESHWARI, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Rajiv Puri – Appellant
Versus
Amit Sharma – Respondent


Table of Content
1. parties entered into a settlement regarding tenancy. (Para 2 , 3)
2. court's acceptance and enforcement of the settlement. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. final order disposing of the appeals. (Para 9)

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. Challenging the order dated 11.10.2023 passed by the High Court of Delhi in CM Appl. No. 46165 of 2022 in R.C.(Rev.) No.123 of 2022 filed by the respondents (landlord) seeking fixation of user and occupation charges of the demised premises bearing No. G-18-A, South Extension Market, Part-I, New Delhi, and order dated 20.10.2023 dismissing CM Appl. No. 55351 of 2023 in R.C.(Rev.) No.123 of 2022 filed by the appellant (tenant) for modification of order dated 11.10.2023, the present appeals have been preferred.

3. During the pendency, several directions were issued with respect to the deposit of interim occupational charges as fixed by this Court. Later, on good sense having prevailed, the parties have entered into an amicable settlement on 23.04.2025 by way of a settlement deed to resolve the dispute in its entirety. As per the settlement deed, appellant has agreed to vacate the demised premises and handover the peaceful possession to respondents a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top