Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
V.C. Jain – Appellant
Versus
Radha Kishan Poddar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background on tenancy and eviction history. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding rental value and legal precedent. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's observations on legal standards. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. determination of user and occupation charges. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. court's determination on charges and procedural directions. (Para 15 , 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)
CM No.22826/2021 (for fixing user & occupation charges) in CM(M) 196/2021
1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the respondents no.2 and 3 (landlords) for fixing the user and occupation charges in respect of the rented premises, Shop No.5179-A ad measuring 843 square feet (sq. ft.) located at Lahori Gate, Naya Bazar.
2. The facts relevant for deciding the present application are set out hereinafter. Shop No.5179-A (demised premises) was let out to the petitioner (tenant) at a monthly rent of Rs.300/- vide lease deed dated 20th July, 1990. On 2nd April, 1996, the landlords filed an eviction petition under Section 14 (1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (the Act). The Additional Rent Controller (ARC), vide judgment dated 23rd May, 2012, allowed th
The court emphasized the necessity of fixing user and occupation charges that reflect fair market rent as a reasonable compensation for landlords during the pendency of eviction appeals.
The tenant must compensate the landlords for the loss occasioned by the stay granted by the Court on the execution of the eviction order, and the best indicator for fixing the compensation payable by....
Tenant cannot claim himself/herself to be tenant qua the premises in question after passing of eviction order and courts after passing of eviction order can always put the tenant of premises to terms....
Tenants must compensate landlords for use and occupation of premises at market rates post-eviction decree, irrespective of prior contractual agreements.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the tenancy terminated with the passing of the eviction order, and the tenants were liable to pay use and occupation charges to reasonably com....
Compensation for mesne profits post-eviction must reflect prevailing market rates rather than prior contractual agreements, mandating substantiated reasoning in the assessment process.
In determining the fair market rent/occupational charges for a commercial property subject to a license agreement, the court may consider factors such as the location, extent of built-up area, nature....
Eviction allowed for bona fide business expansion despite other premises if not reasonably suitable; use and occupation charges enhanced to market rate using credible comparables during stay.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the jurisdiction to direct payment of admitted rent or usage charges during the pendency of a suit, and the landlord is entitled....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
