SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Amit Bansal, J.
V.C. Jain - Appellant
Versus
Radha Kishan Poddar - Respondent
CM(M) 196 of 2021 and CM(M) 204 of 2021
Decided On : 14-09-2021




The court emphasized the necessity of fixing user and occupation charges that reflect fair market rent as a reasonable compensation for landlords during the pendency of eviction appeals.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Section 14(1)(a), Section 14(2), Section 38 - User and occupation charges - The tenant is required to deposit user and occupation charges of Rs.1,00,000/- per month as a condition for staying eviction order - Prevalent market rent considered based on comparable lease deeds - The trial court's discretion is to grant reasonable terms for user charges during pending appeal, preventing excessive charges - Tenant's dispute on the area of premises was not adequately supported by evidence. (Paras 1-15)

(B) Principles of User Charges - The court must fix a reasonable amount for user charges reflecting the fair market rent, not merely the contractual rent. (Paras 6-10)

Facts of the case:
The tenant was renting a shop since 1990 at a nominal rate. Eviction was sought by the landlords, leading to litigation where both parties sought to contest various judgments under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

Findings of Court:
The Court directed deposit of user charges based on market rates, recognizing the understandable need to compensate landlords for loss due to stay on eviction order.

Issues: Whether user charges should be fixed based on market rates despite the tenant's claim on the rented area.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that user charges should reasonably compensate for the loss suffered by the landlord owing to legal delays, and that market conditions must be considered.

Result: Application disposed of with conditions.

Table of Content
1. background on tenancy and eviction history. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding rental value and legal precedent. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's observations on legal standards. (Para 8 , 9)
4. determination of user and occupation charges. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. court's determination on charges and procedural directions. (Para 15 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Amit Bansal, J. (Oral)

CM No.22826/2021 (for fixing user & occupation charges) in CM(M) 196/2021

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the respondents no.2 and 3 (landlords) for fixing the user and occupation charges in respect of the rented premises, Shop No.5179-A ad measuring 843 square feet (sq. ft.) located at Lahori Gate, Naya Bazar.

2. The facts relevant for deciding the present application are set out hereinafter. Shop No.5179-A (demised premises) was let out to the petitioner (tenant) at a monthly rent of Rs.300/- vide lease deed dated 20th July, 1990. On 2nd April, 1996, the landlords filed an eviction petition under Section 14 (1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (the Act). The Additional Rent Controller (ARC), vide judgment dated 23rd May, 2012, allowed the said eviction petition and the matter was put up for consideration of grant of the benefit under Section 14 (2) of the Act to the tenant. The ARC vide order dated 28th July, 2012 granted the benefit of Section 14 (2) to the tenant. Both the landlords as well as the tenant filed appeals under Section 38 of the Act before the Rent Control Tribunal (Tribunal); the landlords, against the order dated 28th July, 2012, and the tenant, against the judgment dated 23rd May, 2012.

3. By the impugned judgment dated 13th February, 2020 passed by the Tribunal, the appeal filed by the landlords against the benefit granted under Section 14 (2) of the Act to the tenant was allowed, and eviction order was passed against the tenant in respect of the demised premises. The appeal filed by the tenants against the judgment passed by the ARC on 23rd May, 2012 was dismissed.

4. The said judgment of the Tribunal has been challenged by the tenant by way of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Vide order dated 5th March, 2021, while issuing notice in the petition, this Court granted stay on the operation of the impugned judgment passed by the Tribunal. The present application for fixation of user and occupation charges was filed by the landlords in July, 2021.

5. It is submitted by the counsel for the landlords that the demised premises are located on the main road of a busy commercial market of Old Delhi. In support of their application, the landlords have placed on record lease deeds dated 1st June, 2018, 6th December, 2019 and 25th October, 2018 in respect of shops no.5185-86, 5184 and 5579 located in the same area and adjacent/opposite to the demised premises. The aforesaid three shops, ad measuring 2550 sq. ft., 1200 sq. ft. and 127.62 sq. ft. have been let out at monthly rental of Rs.4,50,000/- per month, Rs.3,20,000/- per month and Rs.32,000/- per month respectively. Learned counsel for the landlords submits that taking into account the aforesaid rentals, the per sq. ft. rentals of the aforesaid shops work out as follows:

Sl. No.Property No.Current Rentals
1.Property bearing No.5185-86Rs.203/- per Sq. Ft.
2.Property bearing No.5184Rs.267/- per Sq. Ft.
3.Property bearing No.5579Rs.251/- per Sq. Ft.

6. Mr. Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the landlords submits that the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court in Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. Federal Motors (P) Ltd., (2005) 1 SCC 705. In terms of paragraph 19 of the aforesaid judgment of the Supreme Court, the applicants are entitled to reasonable rent with effect from the date the decree was passed, and in the present case, the eviction decree was passed on 13th February, 2020 by the Tribunal. Mr. Gupta has also relied on the judgment in Indian Umbrella Ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top