SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1546

ARAVIND KUMAR, J. K. MAHESHWARI
Executive Engineer, Works Division, PWD – Appellant
Versus
Fregrenando Alex Nunes – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of appeals regarding land compensation (Para 1 , 2)
2. background on land acquisition process (Para 4)
3. arguments on compensation valuation (Para 5 , 6)
4. determination of fair compensation and enhancements (Para 8 , 12)
5. legal principles for determining market value (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
6. final ruling on appeals (Para 13)

ORDER :

2. The State by contending that the compensation enhanced by the Reference Court which has been affirmed by High Court has preferred Civil Appeal No.6297 of 2025 and the land owners have filed Civil Appeal No.6296 of 2025 challenging the common judgment of the High Court dated 22.02.2022 referred to hereinabove.

BRIEF BACKGROUND

5. It is the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the State that the High Court had erred in confirming the compensation determined by the Reference Court on the ground that there was no basis or evidence for arriving at the market value of the property. It is also contended that the High Court had relied upon the sale deed dated 8.2.1993 which deed relates to the acquired land though not produced before the Reference Court since it reflected the price of the acquired land or market value as on da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top