SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1564

SANDEEP MEHTA, VIKRAM NATH
Rajinder Kumar Jaipuria – Appellant
Versus
Sakshi Jaipuria – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. The present appeal arises out of the order dated 23.03.2023 passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court whereby the appellants' petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), seeking quashing of Complaint No. COMA 1596 of 2019 under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) and the summoning order dated 08.11.2019 by which notice was issued to the appellants, was dismissed by the High Court.

3. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are as follows. The appellants are the father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law, and sister-in-law of the respondent-complainant.

3.1. Anuj Jaipuria, the younger son of appellant no.1 and 2, married the respondent-complainant on 22.11.2004. Two children were born out of the said marriage.

3.2. Appellant no.1 purchased a residential house in Noida. The ground floor was occupied by the younger son, Anuj Jaipuria, along with the respondent, while appellant no.1 and appellant no.2 occupied the first floor. The elder son, appellant no.3, and his wife, appellant no.4, reside separately. A housing loan of Rs.2,47,13,363/- was issued in the name of Anuj Jaipuria

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
Unlock Premium Legal Research supremetoday.ai ×
Join SupremeToday AI to access advanced analysis, AI highlights and smart tools.
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top