Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MITALI THAKURIA
Monish Chhabra, S/o. Sri Madanlal Chhabra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam, rep. By The PP, Assam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. domestic violence claim involves relational context. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 2. facts of marriage and allegations (Para 3) |
| 3. petitioner's position and claim (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. legal standpoint on relative’s involvement (Para 7) |
| 5. vague allegations cannot substantiate claims. (Para 8) |
| 6. evaluation of domestic relationship definitions (Para 10 , 19) |
| 7. legal arguments need substantial support. (Para 12 , 18) |
| 8. court requires proof of relationship. (Para 17) |
| 9. conclusion on petition (Para 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
(MITALI THAKURIA, J.)
Heard Ms. K. Malakar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. H. Bora, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent No.1 and Mr. B. D. Konwar, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. B. Soren, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
2. This application is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying for quashing and setting aside of the impugned Notice and impugned Order dated 29.01.2024 passed in connection with the D.V. Case No.08/2024, registered under Sections 12 /18/19/20/21/22 and 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which is pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kamru
The existence of a familial relationship is sufficient to sustain domestic violence proceedings under the Act, regardless of the respondent's residence status.
Domestic violence proceedings under the DV Act require established shared household and direct domestic relationship; mere familial ties are insufficient for liability.
when the allegations are in general nature and where an omnibus allegations are made stating that these petitioners instigated her husband to demand more dowry and other allegations are also made exe....
The court established that proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act cannot be quashed unless it is clear that no prima facie case exists and the allegations are malicious.
A domestic relationship under the D.V. Act requires actual or past residence in a shared household, and mere visits do not suffice to establish such a relationship.
Lack of domestic relationship precludes application of domestic violence laws.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of intentional residence in a shared household as per the definitions in the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, ....
Proceedings initiated under Section 12 seeking reliefs under Sections 18 to 23 are civil in nature – Proceedings under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. and other relevant provisions of Cr.P.C. are not to be fo....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's power to quash proceedings under the DV Act, particularly when the allegations are inherently improbable and fall under the categories ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the shared household definition under the DV Act, emphasizing the importance of permanency in living arrangements and the int....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
