SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1585

ARAVIND KUMAR, J. K. MAHESHWARI
Saroj Porwar (dead) through lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Jugal Kishore – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellant's claim for bona fide need. (Para 2 , 3)
2. prior rulings on bona fide need and hardship. (Para 4)
3. affidavit detailing the changed circumstances. (Para 5)
4. arguments on the validity of the need. (Para 6 , 7)
5. bona fide need upheld despite previous complications. (Para 8)
6. restoration of previous order granting landlord's request. (Para 9)
7. conclusion and order to grant time for eviction. (Para 10)

ORDER :

2. The appellant, who is the landlord, is questioning the judgment dated 1.9.2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ Petition-A No. 20137 of 2010 wherein the High Court affirmed the judgment dated 16.01.2010 passed by the Additional District Judge, Ferozabad in P.A. Appeal No. 65 of 2008 which reversed the order passed by the Rent Controller.

4. The Rent Controller had accepted the plea of bona fide need of the landlady, namely, that daughter-in-law being a qualified doctor was in need of the suit schedule premises for setting up her clinic. On the basis of the oral and documentary evidence tendered by the parties, the prescribed authority (Civil Judge) allowed the petition, which was reversed by the appellate authority by or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top