SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1594

MANOJ MISRA, SANJAY KAROL
Som Nath – Appellant
Versus
Ravinder Kumar – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of the case facts and procedural history. (Para 3 , 4)
2. high court's reasoning for setting aside eviction order. (Para 5)
3. arguments regarding landlord-tenant relationship. (Para 7 , 8)
4. analysis of high court's revisional powers. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. legal reasoning on landlord-tenant relationship termination. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
6. final judgment restoring appellate authority's order. (Para 15 , 16)

ORDER :

1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. This appeal impugns judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana [The High Court] at Chandigarh dated 27.09.2018, whereby the High Court allowed Civil Revision No. 7550 of 2012 filed by the respondent under Section 15 (5) of The East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 [The 1949 Act] and set aside the eviction order passed by the Rent Controller, as affirmed by the Appellate Authority.

4. In short, the facts giving rise to this appeal, inter alia, are:

    (a) The appellant filed a petition under Section 13 of the 1949 Act claiming, inter alia, that - the appellant being the owner of the disputed premises, inducted the respondent as a tenant in the month of June 2007 on a rent of Rs. 5,000 per mont

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top