SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2602

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR
M.Ali – Appellant
Versus
Dibyendu Choudhur – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr.K.Sellathurai

Table of Content
1. review applications context and background (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments presented for reviewing jural relationship (Para 4)
3. court's observations on judicial precedents and legal provisions. (Para 5 , 11)
4. apex court's remarks on jural relationship and evidential issues (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. implications of section 111 of tp act (Para 9 , 10)
6. determination of tenancy and implied surrender (Para 12 , 13)
7. limits of review applications (Para 14)
8. dismissal of review applications (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

S. SOUNTHAR, J.

1. These Review Applications are filed seeking to review the order passed in C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.4224 and 4225 of 2018.

2. The main Civil Revision Petitions are arising out of Rent Control proceedings. The review applicant/ landlady filed petitions for eviction on the ground of wilful default and also for fixation of fair rent. Both the petitions filed by the review applicant were dismissed by the Rent Controller on the ground that there was no jural relationship of landlord and tenant. Aggrieved by the same, the review applicant preferred two Rent Control Appeals and the same were partly allowed by setting aside the findings of the Rent Controller with r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top