SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1617

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Abhay S.Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ.
Kulandaisamy And Another – Appellant
Versus
State Represented By Its Inspector Of Police And Another – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.1224 of 2025 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Criminal) No.14318 of 2024)
Decided on : 07-03-2025

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Quashing of First Information Report - High Court dismissed the petition for quashing on grounds that the investigation was at a preliminary stage and suggested that the matter may be of a civil nature. Court clarified that there is no absolute rule against intervention at this stage. - Court found that the High Court failed to consider the merits of the quashing plea. (Paras 3, 4, 5, 6)

Findings of Court:
The impugned order dated 1st April, 2024 was quashed, and the Criminal Original Petition was restored for hearing on merits.

Issues: Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the petition for quashing the FIR without considering the merits and whether intervention was appropriate at the preliminary investigation stage.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the High Court must consider merits in quashing applications and that procedural rules do not prevent interference at the preliminary stage of an investigation.

Result: Appeal partly allowed.

Table of Content
1. investigation at preliminary stage. (Para 2 , 3)
2. high court's approach on fir quashing. (Para 4 , 5)
3. restoration of petition with open questions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

ORDER :

Leave granted.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. The counter affidavit filed by the respondent-State shows that the investigation is still at the preliminary stage.

4. The appellants filed a petition for quashing First Information Report. In paragraph 6 of the impugned judgment, the High Court observed that there appears to be some material for the investigation to proceed, but at the same time, it was observed that the issue involved in the present case was of a civil nature. Perhaps, the High Court was of the view that the investigation cannot be interfered with at "an infancy stage". There is no absolute rule that even if the investigation is at a preliminary stage, the Court exercising jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, "the CRPC") cannot interfere.

Paragraph 7 of the impugned order reads thus:

    "Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to produce all the requisite documents to disprove the contents of the FIR before the Law Enforcing Agency and the Law Enforcing Agency shall refer the matter as mistake of fact subject to the cognizability of the offence. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed."

5. While dealing with a petition under Section 482 of the CRPC, such approach, as can be seen in paragraph 7 above, on the part of the High Court is unheard of. All that we can see from the impugned judgment is that the High Court has not considered the plea of the appellants for quashing the First Information Report on merits.

6. Therefore, we quash and set aside the impugned order dated 1st April, 2024 and restore Criminal O.P.No.7963 of 2024 to the file of the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The restored petition shall be listed on 24th March, 2025 in the morning before the roster Bench. The parties represented today shall be under an obligation to appear before the High Court on that day and no further notice shall be served.

7. A copy of this order shall be forwarded by the Registry of this Court to the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court of Judicature at Madras who shall ensure that the restored petition is listed before the High Court.

8. All questions are left open to be decided by the High Court.

The appeal is partly allowed on the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top