SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1649

B. R. GAVAI, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Haryana Power Purchase Centre (HPPC) – Appellant
Versus
GMR Kamalanga Energy Limited – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Appellant(s) : In CA. 1929/20 also for RR.2 to 4 in CA. 3429/20 : Mr. M.G. Ramachandran, Sr. Adv. Mr. C. Aryama Sundaram, Sr. Adv. Ms. Poorva Saigal, Adv. Mr. Shubham Arya, Adv. Mr. Nikunj Dayal, AOR Ms. Pallavi Saigal, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Adv. Mr. Harshwardhan Singh, Adv.
In CA. 3429/20 : Mr. Raj Kumar Mehta, AOR Ms. Himanshi Andley, Adv.
For Respondent(s): R1 in CA.1929/20 : Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Damma Seshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vishrov Mukerjee, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR Mr. Yashaswi Kant, Adv. Ms. Juhi Senguttuvan, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Vyas, Adv. Mr. L. Nidhiram Sharma, Adv. Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv. Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv. Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv.
R1 in CA.3429/20 : Mr. Vishrov Mukerjee, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR Mr. Yashaswi Kant, Adv. Ms. Juhi Senguttuvan, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Vyas, Adv. Mr. L. Nidhiram Sharma, Adv. Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv. Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv. Ms. Rajkumari Divyasana, Adv.
R2 in CA.1929/20 & R6 in CA.3429/20 : Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravi Kishore, Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, AOR
R4 in CA.1929/20 : Mr. Raj Kumar Mehta, AOR Ms. Himanshi Andley, Adv.
R5 in CA.1929/20 : Mr. S.B. Upadhyay, Sr. Adv. Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Kathulia, Adv. Ms. Anisha Upadhyay, AOR

Table of Content
1. overview of parties involved in appeals (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments from appellants on legal entitlements (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 12 , 13)
3. court's analysis on apportionment of coal and entitlements (Para 17 , 20 , 39)
4. concluding remarks and orders of the court (Para 46 , 47)

JUDGMENT

B.R.GAVAI, CJI.

FACTUAL ASPECTS

1. These appeals take exception to the judgment and final order dated 20th December 2019 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi [Hereinafter referred to as the ‘APTEL’] in Appeal No. 135 of 2018 along with Appeal No. 54 of 2019, whereby the learned APTEL dismissed the said appeals and upheld the order dated 20th March 2018 passed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, New Delhi [Hereinafter referred to as the ‘CERC’] in Petition No. 105/MP/2017 [Hereinafter referred to as ‘Petition No. 105’].

2. We have two appeals before us, both of which challenge the same judgment and final order of the learned APTEL. The first appeal being Civil Appeal No. 1929 of 2020 has been filed by Haryana Power Purchase Centre and two others [Hereinafter referred to as the ‘HPCC’] whereas the second appeal being Civil Appeal No. 3429 of 2020 has bee

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top