SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1683

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India (Credai) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Ms. Pushpa Ganediwala, Adv. Mr. Pai Amit, AOR Mr. Nikhil Pahwa, Adv. Mr. Abhiyudaya Vats, Adv. Mr. Devdutt Kamat, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Mr. Kapil Madan, Adv. Mr. Devansh Srivastava, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atmaram Nadkarni, Sr. Adv. Mr. Samit Shukla, Adv. Ms. Saakshi Saboo, Adv. Mr. Keshav Sehgal, Adv. Ms. Vaibhavi Bhalerao, Adv. For M/s.Trilegal Advocates On Record
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Vanshdeep Dalmia, AOR Ms. Anisha Jain, Adv. Ms. Shambhavi Singh, Adv. Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, A.S.G. Ms. Sharmishtha Shukla, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Ms. Swarupma Chaturvedi, Adv. Ms. Shraddha Deshmukh, Adv. Ms. Shurya Rai, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, Adv. Mr. Avijit Roy, AOR Mr. Kunal Cheema, Adv. Mr. Akash Kakade, Adv. Mr. Somanatha Padhan, AOR Ms. Sonam Mhatre, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Mehta, Adv. Mr. Swetab Kumar, Adv. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Bhushan Mahendra Oza, AOR Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amber Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Kuldeep Sharma, Adv. Mr. Himanshu Nayyar, Adv.

Table of Content
1. introduction of appeals on environmental orders (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. government’s mandate and environmental clearance procedures (Para 4)
3. arguments against applicability of general conditions (Para 5)
4. impact of ngt order on real estate projects (Para 6)
5. challenges to ngt’s jurisdiction and interpretation (Para 7)
6. supreme court's affirmation of environmental legislation (Para 19 , 20 , 22)
7. conclusion on applicability of notifications (Para 24 , 25)
8. final order on appeals (Para 27)

JUDGMENT :

1. We have heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants, including the intervenor, the learned Additional Solicitor General of India appearing for Respondent No. 1, and the learned senior counsel for Respondent No. 3. We have also perused the materials available on record.

3. By the impugned order, the NGT allowed the original application filed by Respondent No. 3, and directed Respondent No. 1, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change4[In short, “MoEF&CC”] to ensure that all building and construction projects falling wholly or partly within 5 km of the following categories: -

3.1. In arriving at its conclusion, the NGT held, inter alia, that –

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top