B. R. GAVAI, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Kalyani Transco – Appellant
Versus
Bhushan Power And Steel Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. various appeals under ibc against nclat judgment. (Para 1) |
| 2. facts about the corporate debtor's cirp. (Para 2) |
| 3. legal arguments about locus standi of promoters. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. arguments on validity of resolution plan. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. claims related to the implementation and payment terms. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. issues surrounding ebitda distribution. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. court's procedural observations on the appeals. (Para 52 , 53 , 57 , 58) |
| 8. final conclusion on the merit of appeals. (Para 185 , 186 , 190 , 191) |
JUDGMENT :
B.R. GAVAI, CJI
| INDEX | |
| I. | INTRODUCTION |
| II. | FACTS |
| III. | SUBMISSIONS |
| i. | Appellants in Civil Appeal Nos. 2192 – 2193 of 2020 (erstwhile promoters) |
| ii. | Appellants in Civil Appeal No. 2225 of 2020 (Jaldhi Overseas Pte. Limited) |
| iii. | Appellants in Civil Appeal No. 3020 of 2020 (M/s. Medi Carrier Private Limited) and Civil Appeal No. 6390 of 2021 (CJ Darcl Logistics Limited) |
| iv. | Resolved Entity – BPSL |
| v. | Resolution Professional |
| vi. | Committee of Creditors |
| vii. | Successful Resolution Applicant – JSW |
| viii. | Submissions in Rejoinder |
| iv. | ANALYSIS |
| a. | Lo |
Vijay Kumar Jain v. Standard Chartered Bank and Others
Glas Trust Company LLC v. Byju Raveendran and Others
Ebix Singapore Private Limited v. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Limited & Another
Deccan Value Investors L.P. and Another v. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian and Another
State Bank of India and Others v. Consortium of Murari Lal Jalan and Florian Fritsch and Another
Swiss Ribbons Private Limited and Another v. Union of India and Others
India Resurgence ARC Private Limited v. Amit Metaliks Limited and Another
K. Sashidhar v. Indian Overseas Bank and Others
Kalpraj Dharamshi and Another v. Kotak Investment Advisors Limited and Another
Ngaitlang Dhar v. Panna Pragati Infrastructure Private Limited and Another
Arun Kumar Jagatramka v. Jindal Steel and Power Limited and Another
Phoenix ARC Private Limited v. Spade Financial Services Limited and Others
IFCI Limited v. Sutanu Sinha and Others
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited and Another v. Adani Power (Mundra) Limited and Another
Innoventive Industries Limited v. ICICI Bank and Another
Karad Urban Cooperative Bank Limited v. Swwapnil Bhingardevay and Others
K.N. Rajakumar v. V. Nagarajan and Others
Ruchi Soya Industries Limited and Others v. Union of India and Others
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority v. Prabhjit Singh Soni and Another
Vaibhav Goel and Another v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Another
Electrosteel Steel Ltd. (now ESL Steel Ltd.) v. Ispat Carrier P. Ltd.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.