K. VINOD CHANDRAN, N. V. ANJARIA
Amudhavalli – Appellant
Versus
HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. issue of 'pay and recover' in insurance claims. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prior decisions regarding liability of insurance companies. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis on indemnity and liability in insurance. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. examples of previous rulings affecting pay and recover. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. dismissal of the special leave petition. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER :
2. The Tribunal made the award after computing the compensation for the death of the husband of the first petitioner and mulcted the liability on the insurance company, brushing aside the contention that the insured vehicle is a goods vehicle, and the deceased was a travelling passenger on fare. An appeal was filed before the High Court by the insurance company which resulted in the impugned judgment, which assailed both the quantum and the liability to indemnify the insured, the latter ground raised on the breach of conditions of policy, when the goods vehicle carried passengers on fare. The quantum as awarded by the Tribunal was confirmed by the High Court. However, the pay and recovery directed by the Tribunal was set aside.
4. Mr. Joy Basu, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the insurance company, however, point
Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Saju P. Paul and Anr.
Shamanna and Another Vs. Divisional Manager, Oriental. Insurance Company Limited and Others
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Asha Rani
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Baljit Kaur and Others
New India Assurance Company v. Satpal Singh and Others
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Challa Bharathamma & Ors.
National Insurance Company Limited v. Kaushalaya Devi and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.