SURYA KANT, JOYMALYA BAGCHI
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Santi Ceramics Pvt. Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SURYA KANT, J.
Leave granted.
2. The instant appeal has been preferred by the State of West Bengal against the judgment dated 11.10.2018 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Calcutta (High Court) in MAT No. 1260/2017 (Impugned Judgment). By way of the Impugned Judgment, the High Court has upheld the order of the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 29621/2016, directing the State to restore 28 Bighas of land (Subject Land), including all structures erected thereon, to M/s Santi Ceramics Private Limited (Respondent No.1).
3. The controversy arises in the aftermath of this Court's judgment in Kedar Nath Yadav v. State of West Bengal, AIR 2016 SC 4156, whereby the land acquisition proceedings for establishing the manufacturing plant of TATA Motors’ then flagship car “NANO” were quashed. To explicate, in 2006, pursuant to TATA Motors' decision to establish this facility in Singur, Hooghly District, West Bengal, the Appellants had initiated acquisition spanning over 1000 acres (Singur Project). The acquisition encompassed agricultural lands and lands converted for non-agricultural purposes. The instant appeal concerns restoration of the Subject Land, which formed part of t
Kedar Nath Yadav v. State of West Bengal
Delhi Administration v. Gurdip Singh Uban
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Industrial Development Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.