J. K. MAHESHWARI, N. V. ANJARIA
Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam – Appellant
Versus
P. H. Dinesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against madras high court orders (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. writ petitions seeking cbi investigation (Para 4 , 5 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. details of the karur stampede event (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. previous petitions influencing current proceedings (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. public sentiment and political responsibility for the stampede (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. demand for unbiased investigation (Para 28 , 29) |
| 7. conditions for cbi investigation order (Para 30 , 31) |
| 8. interim directions for cbi investigation (Para 32) |
| 9. formation of supervisory committee (Para 33 , 34 , 38) |
| 10. further orders and procedural details (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 40) |
ORDER :
1. In the present set of matters, Special Leave Petition Diary No.58048 of 2025 has been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court dated 3.10.2025 passed in Writ Petition Criminal No. 1000 of 2025, challenging the direction for formation of a Special Investigation Team (hereinafter referred to as “SIT”).
2. Special Leave Petition Diary No. 57588 of 2025 has been filed challenging the order dated 03.10.2025 in WP(MD) No. 27556 of 2025 passed by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, whereby th
State of W.B. vs. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights (2010) 3 SCC 517 [Para 30]
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.