SANJAY KUMAR, ALOK ARADHE
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Janved Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ALOK ARADHE, J.
The law often steps into homes not to witness celebration, but to lift the veil from grief. The present appeal arises from such a home where warmth of a hearth turned into cold silence of death. The State challenges the acquittal of two men, the husband and father-in-law of young woman whose life ended in mysterious, yet telling circumstances.
2. This appeal by the State is directed against judgment and order dated 06.04.2010 in Criminal Appeal No. 66 of 2000, whereby High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior, has set aside the conviction and sentence of both the respondents, recorded by Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 302, 304B, 498A and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and has acquitted them.
PROSECUTION CASE
3. The deceased Smt. Pushpa was married to accused No.2, Mahesh. The marriage however was beset with discord. The deceased was subjected to harassment and cruelty at the hands of her husband (A-2) and father-in-law Janved Singh (A-1), on account of demand for dowry.
4. On 31st December, 1997, accused No.1 lodged a report at Police Station, Gormi stating that when he returned from the agricultural field, he found the deceased lying dead
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra (1984) 4 SCC 116 [Para 12] – Relied
State of West Bengal v. Mir Mohammad Omar C Others (2000) 8 SCC 382 [Para 13] – Relied
Trimukh Maroti Kirkan v. State of Maharashtra (2006) 10 SCC 681 [Para 14] – Relied
Sanjeev C Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2022) 6 SCC 294 [Para 15] – Relied
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.