Back
B. R. GAVAI, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Pradyumna Mukund Kokil – Appellant
Versus
Nashik Municipal Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reservation and acquisition process for land (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. possession claims and subsequent legal actions (Para 8 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. compensation assessment for land acquisition (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. arguments regarding compensation and rental claims (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. counterarguments regarding valuation and rental compensation (Para 20 , 21) |
| 6. court's considerations on compensation and claims (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. evaluation of market value based on statutory provisions (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. dispute over possession and ownership (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. entitlement for rental compensation prior to acquisition (Para 32 , 33) |
| 10. justification for interest as compensation (Para 34 , 36) |
| 11. final judgement on rental claims and costs assessment (Para 39 , 41) |
| 12. overall outcome of the appeal and compensation adjustments (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 13. conclusion of the case with costs considerations (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Leave granted.
3. After the passing of the award, no further steps were taken for acquiring the remaining land measuring 3700 sq. meters. The predecessor in interest of the Appellant (hereinafter referred to as “Original Owner”) submitted an
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
