SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1861

VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA
State Election Commission – Appellant
Versus
Shakti Singh Barthwal – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

VIKRAM NATH, J.

1. This Miscellaneous Application is filed by the petitioner in SLP No. 27946/2025 for modification of the order dated 26.09.2025 passed by this Court.

2. The applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:

    i. Expunge observations relating to conduct of the arguing counsel for the Petitioner at the hearing of the matter on 26.09.2025; and

    ii. Waive costs imposed upon the petitioner while dismissing the Special Leave Petition vide order dated 26.09.2025 passed by this Court; and

    iii. Pass any other such or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.

3. The Special Leave Petition was disposed of vide order dated 26.09.2025 with the following observations:

    “The State Election Commission of the State Uttarakhand has filed this petition against an interlocutory order passed by the High Court whereby the High Court has given reasons for staying the clarification issued by the Commission on the premise that it was contrary to statutory provisions. Despite our communicating to the learned counsel that the matter does not deserve any interference at least six times the counsel continued to insist that this Court must pass some order.

    We are pained at thi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top