Back
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Haribhau @ Bhausaheb Dinkar Kharuse – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J.
1. Criminal Appeal No. 1755 of 2011 is an appeal filed under Section 379 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the CrPC”) and Section 2(a) of the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as “the Supreme Court Act”), by Haribhau @ Bhausaheb Dinkar Kharuse (accused no. 3/appellant no. 1) and Raju @ Rajendra Bhiwrao Shirwale (accused no. 4/appellant no. 2), challenging the final judgment dated 02.02.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2001, whereby the High Court partly allowed the said appeal and reversed the order of acquittal for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “the IPC”), vide the judgment dated 18.05.2001 passed by the VIII Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 72 of 2000.
2. Criminal Appeal No. 150-151 of 2013 is an appeal filed under Section 379 of the CrPC and Section 2(a) of the Supreme Court Act, by Subhash Raghunath Pawar (accused no. 6/appellant), challenging the final judgment dated 02.02.2011 pa
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
