SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M. M. SUNDRESH, NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH, JJ.
The Government Of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By Its Secretary, Transport Department & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
P.R. Jaganathan & Ors Etc. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 13839-13852 of 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 12770-12783 of 2020)
Decided On : 19-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contract governs compensation under 1997 act (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. background of land acquisition and agreements (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. parties' arguments on compensation and interest (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. analysis of contractual obligations and interest (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. supreme court decision on the appeal (Para 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
M.M. Sundresh, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. We have heard Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants and Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, the learned Additional Solicitor General (ASG), Mr. S Nagamuthu, the learned Senior Counsel and other learned counsel appearing for the respondents. We have perused the written arguments and the documents filed by the parties.
3. The issue for consideration in these appeals is: Whether a party to a concluded contract, voluntarily and statutorily entered into, can seek further relief by taking refuge under the statutory provisions?
4. Sections 7 and 12 of The TAMIL NADU ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES ACT , 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the “1997 Act”), read as under:
Section 7 of the 1997 Act
(1) Where any land is acquired by the Government under this Act, the Government shall pay an amount for such acquisition which shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of this section.
(2) Where the amount has been determined by agreement between the Government and the person to whom the amount has to be paid, it shall be paid in accordance with such agreement.
(3) Where no such agreement can be reached, the Government shall refer the case to the Collector for determination of the amount to be paid for such acquisition as also the person or persons to whom such amount shall be paid:
Provided that no amount exceeding such amount as the Government may, by general order, specify to be paid for such acquisition shall be determined by the Collector without the previous approval of the Government officer as the Government may appoint in this behalf.
(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3), after the case is referred to the Collector under that sub-section, but before he has finally determined the amount, if the amount is determined by agreement between the Government and the person to whom the amount has to be paid, such amount shall be paid by the Collector in accordance with such agreement.
(5) Before finally determining the amount, the Collector shall give an opportunity to every person to whom the amount has to be paid to state his case as to the amount.
(6) In determining the amount, the Collector shall be guided by the provisions contained in sections 23 and 24 and other relevant provisions of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894, (Central Act I of 1894) subject to modifications that-
(a) in the said section 23, the references to the date of publication of the notification under section 4, sub-section (1) and the time of publication of the declaration under section 6 of the said Act shall be construed as references to the date of publication of notice under sub-sections (2) and (1), respectively, of section 3 of this Act; and
(b) in the said section 24, the references to the date of publication of notification under section 4, sub-section (1) and the date of publication of the declaration under section 6 of the said Act shall be construed as references to the date of publication of notice under sub-sections (2) and (1), respectively, of section 3 of this Act.
(7) For the purpose of determining the amount-
(a) the Collector shall have power to require any person to deliver to him such returns and assessments as he considers necessary;
(b) the Collector shall also have power to require any person known or believed to be interested in the land to deliver to him a statement containing as far as may be practicable, the name of every other person interested in the land as co-owner, mortgagee, tenant or otherwise, and the nature of such interest, and of the rents a
G. Mohan Rao & Ors. versus State of Tamil Nadu & Ors
Union of India and Others v. N. Murugesan and Others
Ranveer Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2016) 14 SCC 191 [Para 24]
Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal and Others
State of Karnataka and Others v. Sangappa Dyavappa Biradar and Others
NOIDA Industrial Development Authority v. Ravindra Kumar
State of Gujarat and Others v. Daya Shamji Bhai and Others (1995) 5 SCC 746 [Para 24]
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.