B. V. NAGARATHNA, R. MAHADEVAN
Samadhan S/O Sitatram Manmothe – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharasthra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NAGARATHNA, J.
Leave granted.
2. Being aggrieved by the order dated 06.03.2025 passed by the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad in Criminal Application No. 601 of 2025 dismissing the application filed by the appellant under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) seeking quashing of FIR No. 294 of 2024, registered with City Chowk Police Station, District Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar City on 31.08.2024, for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 376(2)(n) and 507 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “IPC”), the appellant is before this Court.
3. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for respondent No.1-State and learned Amicus Curiae, Ms. Radhika Gautham, for respondent No.2 as the latter has not responded to the notice issued and served on her.
4. Briefly stated the facts of this case as per the prosecution are that respondent No.2 had lodged a complaint with City Chowk Police Station, District Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar City, stating that she was married to a person ABC in the year 2019 and had a minor daughter out of the said wedlock. However, due to matrimonial discord with her husband and in-laws, she ha
Mahesh Damu Khare vs. State of Maharashtra
Prashant vs. State of NCT of Delhi
Rajnish Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.