ORDER :

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned judgment of the High Court which refused to interfere with the order of ‘unilateral deemed conveyance’ issued by the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963¹[for short, ‘the Act of 1963’]. The petitioner-builder’s contention is that the petitioner was not issued with a notice and afforded a reasonable opportunity of hearing as stipulated under the Act of 1963 read with Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale Management and Transfer) Rules, 1964²[for short, ‘the Rules of 1964’]. Based on the above order of the Competent Authority, a deed of conveyance was registered by the Sub- Registrar, Haveli No.17, Pune, which, as a consequence was refused to be interfered with by the impugned judgment.

2. In the writ pe