SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 113

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Amit Borkar, J
Veer Tower Co-operative Housing Society Limited. – Appellant
Versus
District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Mumbai City (4) – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar with Mr. Aadil Parsurampuria, Ms. Pragya, Mr. Laxminarayan Shukla, Mr. Mehur Rathod and Mr. Ameya Khot i/by M/s. Legal Vision for the petitioner.
Ms. Sulbha Chipade, AGP for respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Yogesh C. Naidu with Mr. Eden Ribeiro and Mr. Talha Siddiqui for respondent No.2.
Mr. Akash Rebello i/by Mr. Eden DH Ribeiro for
respondent No.3.
Mr. Anoushok Daver i/by Mr. Talha Siddiqui for
respondent No.4.
Mr. Ashwin Shete with Mr. Abhay Dhadiwal and Mr. Rishi Patodia i/by Jayakar & Partners for respondent Nos.6 to 8.
Mr. Anukul Seth for respondent Nos.9 and 10.

JUDGMENT :

1. In the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the impugned Judgment and Order passed by respondent No. 1, which dismissed the petitioner’s application for the conferment of deemed conveyance under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management, and Transfer) Act, 1963 (hereinafter, the “MOFA Act”). The petitioner principally relies on three grounds for its challenge: firstly, that the developer has not yet availed the full Floor Space Index (FSI) available for the development; secondly, that, as per the terms of the agreement governing the transaction, the right to conveyance is conditioned upon the complete redevelopment of all constituent societies; and thirdly, that the Architect’s certificate tendered in support of the proposal is erroneous. These contentions, if sustained, would undermine the validity of the impugned decision and the consequent rejection of the petitioner’s plea for deemed conveyance.

2. The petitioner, having instituted the proceedings, submitted a proposal on 8th March 2022 before respondent No.1, seeking the issuance of de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top