SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1876

B. R. GAVAI, VIKRAM NATH
In Re : T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amicus Curiae :Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. [A.C.] (Not Present), Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Sr. Advocate [A.C.] (Not Present), Ms. Aparajita Singh, Sr. Advocate [A.C.] (Not Present), Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Advocate [A.C.] (Not Present), Mr. K. Parameshwar, Advocate [A.C.], Ms. Arti Gupta, Adv., Ms. Kanti, Adv.
For the Parties : Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G., Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR, Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Adv., Ms. Suhashini Sen, Adv., Mr. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv., Mr. S. S. Rebello, Adv., Mr. Shyam Gopal, Adv., Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv., Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam, Adv., Ms. Shivika Mehra,Adv., Ms. Shagun Thakur,Adv., Ms. Ameyavikrama Thanvai, Adv., Ms. Ms Aishwarya Bhati, ASG, Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR, Mr. Ravi K Chandna, Adv., Ms. Shruti A Chandna, Adv., Mr. Gaurav Tripathi, Adv., Mr. Karan Chhibber, Adv., Ms. Shivika Mehra, Adv., Mr. Rajul Shrivastav, Adv., Mr. Anubhav Sharma, Adv., Mr. Shyam Divan,Sr.Adv., Ms. Nina Nariman,Adv., Ms. Tahira Karanjawala,Adv., Mr. Arjun Sharma, Adv., Mr. Shreyas Meheshwari, Adv., Mr. Ritwik Mohapatra, Adv., For M/s. Karanjawala & Co., Dr. Abhishek Atrey, Adv., Mr. Krishnam Mishra, Adv., Ms. Ambika Atrey, Adv., Ms. Vidyottma Jha, Adv., Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, AOR, Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv., Mr. Vaibhav Sabharwal, Adv., Mr. Akshay Kumar, Adv., Ms. Misha Rohatgi Mohta, Adv., Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Adv., Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Adv., Mr. Naveen Kumar, Adv., Ms. Aprajita Bhardwaj,Adv., Mr. M. Shoeb Alam,Adv., Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv., Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR, Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee, Adv., Mr. Rohit Bansal, Adv., Ms. Kshitij Singh, Adv., Ms. Astha Sharma, AOR, Mr. Naresh Kumar, AOR.

Table of Content
1. unauthorized construction demolished; possession taken. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. debate over e-rickshaws in matheran. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. balancing environmental concerns and resident needs. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. monitoring committee to address e-rickshaws and roads. (Para 13 , 14)
5. various applications entertained and listed. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)

ORDER :

I.A. NO.3973/2017 (ITEM NO.1)

Dr. Abhishek Atrey, learned counsel appearing for the State of Uttrakhand submits that the unauthorized construction has already been demolished and the possession of premises has been taken over by the Forest Department.

2. As such no orders are required to be passed in this application.

3. The I.A. is, accordingly, disposed of.

I.A. NOS.79569, 79576, 159670 & 159677 OF 2019, 14261 & 14262/2021, 40624 and 40599 of 2023 (ITEM NO.2)

4. Mainly two issues are involved in these applications i.e. (i) With regard to permitting the E-Rickshaws in the city of Matheran; and (ii) Laying down of paver blocks etc. on the roads in the city of Matheran.

5. Shri K. Parameshwar, learned Amicus Curiae, submits that on account of the restrictions of permitting any vehicles

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top