Bhashkar Singh @ Bikash Kumar vs State of Bihar Patna

Q: Key Points

Question 1? Question 2? Question 3?Question 1?Question 2?Question 3?

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(SC) 37

M. M. SUNDRESH, N. KOTISWAR SINGH
Bhashkar Singh @ Bikash Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar Patna – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Tushar Giri, Adv. Mr. Sahil Bhalaik, AOR Mr. Siddharth Anil Khanna, Adv. Mr. Ritik Arora, Adv. Mr. Shivam Mishra, Adv. Ms. Gulshan Jahan, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Azmat Hayat Amanullah, AOR Ms. Ekta Kundu, Adv. Mr. Chandan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajnish Kumar Jha, AOR Mr. Ravi Raj, Adv. Mr. Sakal Dev Sharma, Adv.

Judgement Key Points

Question 1? Question 2? Question 3?

Question 1?

Question 2?

Question 3?

Table of Content
1. facts of the case and prior bail grants. (Para 2 , 4)
2. court expresses inclination to grant bail. (Para 3 , 5)
3. bail granted and appeal allowed. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

ORDER

2. The appellant seeks bail in connection with FIR No.20/2023, dated 14.08.2023, registered at Police Station Khagaria (Cyber), for the offences punishable under Sections 419 , 420, 379, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860, Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 3 of the Bihar Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 2002.

4. We have been informed that the appellant has been under incarceration for two years and two months approximately. Though similar offences have been registered against him, he has been granted bail in all those cases.

6. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appellant is granted bail on the terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court.

8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document