SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 2274

VIJAY BISHNOI
Kajali Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mohan Lal, Advocate, S.K. Bhati, Advocate, L.K. Ramdhari, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioner(s) has/have been arrested in FIR No.69/2021 of Police Station Raisinghnagar, Distt. Sri Ganganagar for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 376(D) IPC and Section 66(e) of the IT Act.

3. He/she/they has/have preferred this/these bail application(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that allegations levelled against the petitioner are absolutely false. It is further submitted that the matter has already been compromised between the parties. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and trial of the case is likely to take time.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application, however, learned counsel for the complainant has verified the factum of compromise.

6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

7. Accordingly, this/these bail application(s) filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is/are allowed and it is directed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top