SANJAY KUMAR, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Reginamary Chellamani – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. by Superintendent of Customs – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant, Reginamary Chellamani, is aggrieved by the denial of regular bail by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, vide order dated 24.07.2025 passed in Crl. O.P. No. 7857/2025, in relation to Case R.R. No. 41/2021 (C.C. No. 225/2022 on the file of the learned Principal Special Judge under EC and NDPS Act Cases, Chennai), for the offences punishable under Section 8(c) read with Sections 20(b)(ii)(C), 22(c), 23, 28 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 19851 [“NDPS Act” for short] read with Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962.
3. The amount of contraband substance allegedly seized from the person of the appellant, Reginamary Chellamani, is stated to be above the commercial quantity prescribed in that regard under the aforestated enactment. We, however, find that the appellant, Reginamary Chellamani, has been in custody for 4 years 1 month and 28 days as on date.
4. Given the length of incarceration that the appellant has already suffered and as an identically situated accused person, who was travelling along with the appellant, Reginamary Chellamani, on the same flight, has been granted bail by this Court, we are inclined to
Right to legal aid – It is incumbent upon Trial Courts dealing with criminal proceedings, to inform accused of their right to legal representation and their entitlement to be represented by legal aid....
Prolonged incarceration without trial can lead to the violation of the fundamental right to liberty, allowing for the possibility of bail despite statutory restrictions under the NDPS Act.
Section 37 of NDPS Act specifically stipulates certain conditions to be satisfied for purpose of granting bail.
The main legal point established is the need for expedited trial in cases involving prolonged incarceration, as emphasized by the directions of the Hon'ble Apex Court.
Courts must explicitly record twin satisfaction under NDPS Act Section 37(1)(b)(ii) for bail in commercial quantity cases; non-recording is jurisdictional defect rendering order unsustainable, even c....
Event though the applicant has 15 other criminal cases registered against him, he has only two cases coming under the NDPS Act registered against him. In those cases, he has been granted bail because....
Bail – Seizure of Ganja – Bail can be granted to accused where period of custody is long and not a single witness has been examined.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution can override the statutory embargo created under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the ND....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.