SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 194

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.K. Maheshwari, Atul S. Chandurkar, JJ.
The State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Namonarayan Sharma & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 2481-2488 of 2026 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos. 13102-13109 of 2020)
Decided On : 28-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG,, Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR
For the Respondent: Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv., Mr. Puneet Jain, Adv. Ms. Christi Jain, AOR, Mr. Akshit Gupta, Adv., Mr. Mann Arora, Adv. Ms. Akriti Sharma, Adv., Mr. Harsh Jain, Adv., Mr. Aditya Jain, Adv., Mr. Yogit Kamat, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Jain, Adv., Mr. Arjun Kanadi, Adv., Mr. Om Sudhir Vidyarthi, Adv., Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Sr. Adv. Ms. Charu Mathur, AOR, Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR, Mr. Mayank Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Mudit Bansal, Adv., Mr. Girraj Singh Yadav, Adv., Mr. Abhijeet Singh, Adv., Mr. Anirudh Singh, Adv. Ms. Chitrangda Rastravara, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Aggarwal, Adv., Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Adv. Mrs. Pearl Pundir, Adv., Mr. Gp. Capt. Karan Singh Bhati, AOR, Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv., Mr. Vikram Nagpal, Adv. Ms. Deepsea Chakraborty, Adv., Mr. Aman Jha, AOR Ms. Ankita Chaudhary, AOR, Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR, Mr. Balwant Singh Billowira, Adv. Dr. Ravinder Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Kaninika Majumder, Adv., Mr. Akshay Singh, Adv., Mr. Akash Yadav, Adv., Mr. Anirudh Ray, Adv. Ms. Arpita Mishra, Adv. Ms. Shilpa Singh, AOR, Mr. Abhay Anand Jena, AOR, Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv., Mr. Keane Sardhina, Adv., Mr. Narender Kumar Verma, AOR, Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Sr. Adv., Ms. Charu Mathur, AOR

Appointments for Grade III Teachers must reflect accurate merit while adhering to court directives on recruitment processes, ensuring transparency and fairness in selections.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment and selection processes - Case refers to the appointments of Grade III Teachers in Rajasthan - Relevant judgments include Ramdhan Kumawat and Mukesh Kumar Tailor cases, addressing flawed answer keys and directives issued by court. - The State's failure to appeal earlier judgments or adhere to directives led to continuous litigation. - The court mandated the State to revise appointment lists based on correct merit ordering, ensuring candidates with superior marks receive due process. (Paras 4-20)

(B) Educational Qualifications and Employment - Court emphasized the necessity for accurate answer keys and transparent recruitment processes to uphold meritocracy. Reports and model answers need to be validated by an expert committee before finalizing candidates. (Paras 2-6, 8, 12)

(C) Continuity of Employment - Those wrongly terminated may not lose their positions if no fault is found, ensuring employment stability until issues are resolved. (Paras 10-11)

Table of Content
1. recruitment procedure details. (Para 3)
2. challenges to selection due to flawed answer keys. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. continuation of teachers based on past lists. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. vacancy determination and appointment directions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. final order and direction to implement findings. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT :

J.K. MAHESHWARI, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Applications for impleadment/intervention are allowed.

3. These Civil Appeals pertain to the recruitment, selection and appointment of the Grade III Teachers (level I and level II) in various places across 33 districts in the State of Rajasthan. The advertisement was issued on 24.02.2012 notifying 39544 posts, out of which, 10690 posts were for level I (Class 1 to 5) and 28935 posts for level II (Class 6 to 8). Indisputably, the recruitment was conducted district wise through the Panchayati Raj Department. The examination was held on 02.06.2012 and results were declared on 27.08.2012 and the orders of appointment were issued.

4. The batch of unsuccessful candidates challenged the process of selection before the High Court, inter-alia contending that flawed answer keys were given, which led to erroneous result of the examination. In the pleadings, illustration and examples of the questions and their answers were given, which has been discussed by the High Court. However, after analysing the contentions, the High Court in the case of Ramdhan Kumawat vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr., (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10622 of 2014) vide judgment dated 18.11.2014, issued the following directions :

    “9. In that view of the matter, the Court deems it proper to give the following directions :

    (i) The respondent No.1-State Government in Panchayati Raj Department shall appoint an Expert committee for preparing the model answer keys to the question papers of all subjects in respect of the examination held on 2/6/2012 for the posts of Teacher Gr.II (Level I & II) at different Districts. The said Expert Committee shall comprise of the experts who are either Readers or Senior Professors in Rajasthan University or a very learned and reputed persons in the concerned subject. They shall be appointed by the respondent No.1 at the earliest and latest by 28/11/2014.

    (ii) The said Expert Committee shall prepare the model answer keys, taking recourse to the standard text books prescribed for being taught in the schools and standard reference books used for colleges, published by the Education Boards or the State Government, or shall take recourse to other government publications or materials, which are officially put on the government website or used for the information of public at large, or to the publications of the books written by the authors recognized by the Government as the authority on a particular subject. The Expert Committee shall disclose the source of information relied upon by them for each of the answer keys, while submitting their reports to the respondent No.1.

    (iii) The Expert Committee shall prepare the model answer keys on or before 15/12/2014 and shall cause them to be put on the website of the Government in Panchayati Raj Department on the same date, inviting objections from the candidates who had appeared in the examination in question.

    (iv) The candidates shall submit their objections before the concerned Expert Committee on or before 18/12/2014. The Expert Committee, after taking into consideration the objections, if any submitted by the candidates, shall prepare final model answer keys for each of the question papers of the concerned subjects and submit the same to the respondent No.1 in the sealed cover not later than 22/12/2014.

    (v) The respondent No.1 shall prepare the merit list afresh of the selected candidates for being appointed in the respective zila Parishads on the basis of the said model answer keys prepared by the experts committee as early as possible and put on the Government website latest by 31/12/2014.

    (vi) Since the f

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top