SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 194

J. K. MAHESHWARI, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Namonarayan Sharma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG,, Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR
For the Respondent: Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv., Mr. Puneet Jain, Adv. Ms. Christi Jain, AOR, Mr. Akshit Gupta, Adv., Mr. Mann Arora, Adv. Ms. Akriti Sharma, Adv., Mr. Harsh Jain, Adv., Mr. Aditya Jain, Adv., Mr. Yogit Kamat, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Jain, Adv., Mr. Arjun Kanadi, Adv., Mr. Om Sudhir Vidyarthi, Adv., Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Sr. Adv. Ms. Charu Mathur, AOR, Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR, Mr. Mayank Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Mudit Bansal, Adv., Mr. Girraj Singh Yadav, Adv., Mr. Abhijeet Singh, Adv., Mr. Anirudh Singh, Adv. Ms. Chitrangda Rastravara, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Aggarwal, Adv., Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Adv. Mrs. Pearl Pundir, Adv., Mr. Gp. Capt. Karan Singh Bhati, AOR, Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv., Mr. Vikram Nagpal, Adv. Ms. Deepsea Chakraborty, Adv., Mr. Aman Jha, AOR Ms. Ankita Chaudhary, AOR, Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR, Mr. Balwant Singh Billowira, Adv. Dr. Ravinder Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Kaninika Majumder, Adv., Mr. Akshay Singh, Adv., Mr. Akash Yadav, Adv., Mr. Anirudh Ray, Adv. Ms. Arpita Mishra, Adv. Ms. Shilpa Singh, AOR, Mr. Abhay Anand Jena, AOR, Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Adv., Mr. Keane Sardhina, Adv., Mr. Narender Kumar Verma, AOR, Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Sr. Adv., Ms. Charu Mathur, AOR

Table of Content
1. recruitment procedure details. (Para 3)
2. challenges to selection due to flawed answer keys. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. continuation of teachers based on past lists. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. vacancy determination and appointment directions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. final order and direction to implement findings. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT :

J.K. MAHESHWARI, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Applications for impleadment/intervention are allowed.

3. These Civil Appeals pertain to the recruitment, selection and appointment of the Grade III Teachers (level I and level II) in various places across 33 districts in the State of Rajasthan. The advertisement was issued on 24.02.2012 notifying 39544 posts, out of which, 10690 posts were for level I (Class 1 to 5) and 28935 posts for level II (Class 6 to 8). Indisputably, the recruitment was conducted district wise through the Panchayati Raj Department. The examination was held on 02.06.2012 and results were declared on 27.08.2012 and the orders of appointment were issued.

4. The batch of unsuccessful candidates challenged the process of selection before the High Court, inter-alia contending that flawed answer keys were given, w

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top