IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
MOHIT KUMAR SHAH, J.
Arbind Kumar Chaudhary, S/o. Late Ram Punit Chaudhary & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9179 of 2019
Decided On : 24-12-2021
Service Law – Compassionate Appointment – Once Respondents have acted in compliance of Judgment of this Court dated 08.01.2019 passed in CWJC No. 8843 of 2018 and have appointed petitioners on regular post of Teacher vide memo dated 21.02.2019, no interference can be made with their service condition at this juncture, de hors fact that State Government has issued Circular dated 07.03.2019, which is held to be inapplicable in present case, inasmuch as firstly same is a subsequent event – If petitioners have been appointed as Teachers in cadre, petitioners cannot now be ousted from cadre – Respondents shall not interfere with appointment of petitioners made on regular vacant post of Teacher/ Assistant Teacher in regular pay-scale vide memo no. 412 dated 21.02.2019, issued by District Education Officer, Saran and by District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saran. (Paras 13 and 14)
JUDGMENT :
The present writ petition has been filed for quashing memo dated 07.03.2019, issued by the Respondent No. 1 bearing the signature of the Respondent No. 3 i.e. the Joint Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna whereby and whereunder the Government of Bihar, in compliance of the order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 4776-4777/2017 (Mukesh & Another vs. State of Bihar & Others) dated 03.04.2017, has taken the following decisions:-
(ii) In compliance of the aforesaid Order, appointment on Compassionate ground shall be made on the regular post of teacher and in the regular pay-scale, only against the available vacancy.
(iii) This order shall be applicable only with regard to the parties of the case in reference and that of the enclosed case.
(iv) The letter of the Education Department dated 12.01.2018 is surpassed by the present order.
(v) This Order shall be enforced with effect from 12.01.2018.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the father of the petitioners herein died in harness prior to 01.07.2006 and at that time, no family members of the petitioners were in any service. The petitioners being intermediate pass or possessing qualification higher than intermediate pass, at the relevant time, had made applications for appointment on compassionate ground before the concerned respondents in the year 2006, whereafter their cases were recommended for appointment on compassionate ground on the regular post of Teacher by the District Compassionate Committee, Saran. While the petitioners no. 1 to 8 were recommended vide letter dated 15.01.2007, the petitioner no. 9 was recommended vide letter dated 19.11.2007. Thereafter, the petitioners were appointed on the contractual post of Panchayat / Block Teacher as per the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher/Municipal Teacher (Appointment & Service Conditions) Rules, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rules 2006’). The petitioners no. 1 to 8 had then joined as contractual teacher in the year, 2007 while the petitioner no. 9 had joined in the year, 2008. At this juncture, it is submitted that the post of Panchayat / Block Teacher / Town Teacher is not a Government post and in such view of the matter, even the Government of Bihar, by a letter dated 17.10.2008, issued under the pen and signature of the Dy. Secretary to the Government, Depart. of Labour & Administrative Reforms, had clarified that the post of Panchayat Teacher / Block Teacher/ Town Teacher is not a post under the Govt. of Bihar, hence, no recommendation for appointment on compassionate ground can be made for such posts. In fact, the petitioners are stated to have been recommended to be appointed on regular vacant posts.
3. The petitioners no. 1 to 6 and 9 had then approached this Court by filing various writ petitions bearing C.W.J.C. No. 17953 of 2008, C.W.J.C. No. 3638 of 2008, C.W.J.C. No. 721 of 2008, C.W.J.C. No. 14855 of 2008, C.W.J.C. No. 654 of 2008, C.W.J.C. No. 1461 of 2008 and C.W.J.C. No. 14420 of 2009, which were allowed vide order dated 08.01.2010, passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court and the respondents were directed to consider the case of the said petitioners for appointment in light of the letter no. 6905 dated 17.10.2008, issued by the Personnel & Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, wherein it has been clearly pointed out that the posts of Panchayat / Prakhand / Nagar Shikshaks are not under the State Government and with respect to such posts, the District Compassionate Appointment Committee cannot make any recommendation
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the rejection of a claim for compassionate appointment after 11 years, when the petitioner had already applied for compassionate appointment i....
Once a compassionate appointment is accepted, the right to further appointment under the same scheme is extinguished, and lacking requisite qualifications invalidates the appointment.
Compassionate appointments are not automatic and must adhere to the rules in force at the time of the employee's death, ensuring equitable treatment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.