SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 495

J. K. MAHESHWARI, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
Neetu Solvents – Appellant
Versus
Vineet Nagar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Hirday Virdi, Adv. For Respondent(s): Mr. Amarjeet Singh, AOR Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR Mr. B.K. Satija, A.A.G. Mr. Rahul Khurana, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Gaj Singh, Adv. Mr. Vivek Bedi, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Shivansh Panday, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR
For the Appellant(s) :Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Hirday Virdi, Adv. For Respondent(s): Mr. Amarjeet Singh, AOR Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR Mr. B.K. Satija, A.A.G. Mr. Rahul Khurana, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Gaj Singh, Adv. Mr. Vivek Bedi, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Shivansh Panday, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The judgment holds that closure solely for lack of prior EC is unjustified where PCBs granted consents unaware of EC requirement and units complied and sought ex-post facto EC. (!) (!) (!) - Units established and operating under CTE/CTO may continue to operate pending EC decision, with conditions and timelines, and ex-post facto EC can be permissible in appropriate cases. (!) (!) (!) (!) - The Court applies the ratio of Pahwa Plastics (supra) mutatis mutandis to allow ex-post facto EC and continued operation, distinguishing reliance on Dastak N.G.O. which was set aside. (!) (!) (!) (!) - Final directions require the Union of India to decide EC applications within a specified timeframe and restore electricity if disconnected, with implementation steps outlined. (!) (!) - Public consultation may be exempted for units in industrial estates; screening, scoping completed, TOR granted, appraisal pending. (!) (!) (!)

What is the legality of granting ex-post facto Environmental Clearance (EC) for units established and operated with CTE/CTO when prior EC was not obtained?

What is the permissible scope of operation for manufacturing units pending EC while ex-post facto EC is considered?

What are the applicable precedents and principles (Pahwa Plastics, Dastak N.G.O., Vanashakti, Electrosteel) governing ex-post facto EC and continued operation?


Table of Content
1. ngt ordered closure of formaldehyde units lacking ec (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. ex-post facto ec invalid per vanashakti judgment (Para 5 , 6)
3. units established with cte/cto; ec applications pending (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. pahwa distinguished on worker numbers and ec mandate (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. pahwa set aside ngt closure for similar units (Para 17 , 18)
6. appellant units mirror pahwa with tor granted (Para 19)
7. pahwa ratio applies; permit operation pending ec (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

JUDGMENT :

J.K. MAHESHWARI, J.

1. In all these appeals, the appellants are the industries, and running the manufacturing units of Formaldehyde, its different resins (including melamine formaldehyde, urea formaldehyde and phenol formaldehyde) in the States of Rajasthan and Haryana. In Civil Appeal No.2881 of 2021, Civil Appeal No.4432 of 2021, Civil Appeal No.4431 of 2021 and Civil Appeal No.4748 of 2021 the units are situated in State of Rajasthan while in Civil Appeal No.4654 of 2021, Civil Appeal No.4908 of 2021 and Civil Appeal No.4902-4903 of 2021 the units are situated in State of Haryana.

2. Three Original Applications were preferred, being O.A. No. 2

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top