SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 495

J. K. MAHESHWARI, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
Neetu Solvents – Appellant
Versus
Vineet Nagar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Hirday Virdi, Adv. For Respondent(s): Mr. Amarjeet Singh, AOR Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR Mr. B.K. Satija, A.A.G. Mr. Rahul Khurana, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Gaj Singh, Adv. Mr. Vivek Bedi, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Shivansh Panday, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR
For the Appellant(s) :Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR Mr. Hirday Virdi, Adv. For Respondent(s): Mr. Amarjeet Singh, AOR Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, AOR Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR Mr. B.K. Satija, A.A.G. Mr. Rahul Khurana, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Mr. Aman Dev Sharma, Adv. Mr. Gaj Singh, Adv. Mr. Vivek Bedi, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma, A.A.G. Mr. Shivansh Panday, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Rajpal, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, AOR Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR

JUDGMENT :

J.K. MAHESHWARI, J.

1. In all these appeals, the appellants are the industries, and running the manufacturing units of Formaldehyde, its different resins (including melamine formaldehyde, urea formaldehyde and phenol formaldehyde) in the States of Rajasthan and Haryana. In Civil Appeal No.2881 of 2021, Civil Appeal No.4432 of 2021, Civil Appeal No.4431 of 2021 and Civil Appeal No.4748 of 2021 the units are situated in State of Rajasthan while in Civil Appeal No.4654 of 2021, Civil Appeal No.4908 of 2021 and Civil Appeal No.4902-4903 of 2021 the units are situated in State of Haryana.

2. Three Original Applications were preferred, being O.A. No. 298/2020 (Vineet Nagar v. CGWA), O.A. No. 287/2020 (Dastak N.G.O. v. Synochem Organics Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. and O.A. No. 840/2019 (Ayush Garg v. Union of India) before the National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (for brevity ‘NGT’). In those original applications, it was contended that the units of formaldehyde manufacturing have been established and are operating without prior Environmental Clearance (for brevity ‘EC’).

3. The NGT decided all the said original applications on 03.06.2021, albeit by three different orders. The

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
              whatsapp-icon Back to top