SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 566

PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ALOK ARADHE
Vice Chancellor, Rajiv Gandhi National Aviation University – Appellant
Versus
Jitendra Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Satya Darshi Sanjay, A.S.G. Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, AOR Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv. Mr. Shaurya R Rai, Adv. Mr. Satvika Thakur, Adv. Mr. Jagdish Chandra Solanki, Adv. Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Sr. Adv. Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh, AOR Ms. Poornima Singh, Adv. Mr. Narendra Pandey, Adv. Mr. J Tarun Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sauvik Singh, Adv. Mr. Ankit Khatri, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. P.s. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kartikeya Singh, AOR Ms. Akshita Nigam, Adv. Ms. Gayatri Gokula Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Kaushlendra Dutt Pandey, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Singh, Adv.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The appointing authority under transitional provisions has power to terminate/remov e during probation, as implied by General Clauses Act 1897 and transitional provisions (Section 46 and Statute 28(1)) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) - The Visitor (President of India) is empowered to appoint the first Registrar and has a role in disciplinary actions under transitional arrangements, with termination aligned to the appointing authority’s powers (!) (!) (!) - Section 46(b) and Statute No.28(1) interpreted to mean the Visitor/appointing authority can terminate services of the First Registrar during the transitional period, with the action deemed in consonance with statutory provisions (!) (!) (!) - The High Court’s finding that the Visitor had no role in disciplinary proceedings was concluded to be incorrect; the Visitor’s role in termination under transitional provisions is upheld in the judgment (!) - The tenure of the First Registrar under Section 46(b) was three years (01.03.2019 to 28.02.2022), and termination by the Visitor was seen as consistent with Statute No.28(1) (!) - The Court disposed of the appeals by affirming the disciplinary authority of the Visitor and declined to intervene in back wages due to expiry of appointment and litigation history (!) (!) - The judgment clarifies that the transitional provision operates as the appointing authority for disciplinary matters during the transitional phase (!)

What is the legal authority to terminate or suspend an appointee during a transitional phase under a university Act?

What is the scope of disciplinary authority of the Visitor/appointing authority in relation to initial appointments made during transitional provisions?

What is the admissible extent of back wages or salary when termination occurs during probation and after transitional actions?


Table of Content
1. procedural background and factual history of the termination dispute. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
2. disputed authority of the visitor in university disciplinary proceedings. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
3. statutory analysis of transitional provisions and disciplinary jurisdiction. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
4. an appointing authority inherently possesses the power to terminate. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. non-interference with high court operative directions due to peculiar circumstances. (Para 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT : :

ALOK ARADHE, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. These appeals assail the order dated 22.05.2024 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench (“the High Court”), whereby the appeal preferred by respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as “the First Registrar”) was allowed and the order dated 25.04.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge, as well as the order dated 27.04.2022 passed by the Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Civil Aviation, Government of India, were set aside.

FACTS

3. The relevant facts giving rise to the filing of the present appeals are set out hereinbelow.

4. The Rajiv G

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top